2013 Iveco Daily 2.3L Diesel · CU13 KLS

Chronic electrical lighting faults and recurring suspension joint wear dominate the mechanical record of this 2013 Iveco Daily, with two separate MOT failures recorded within the last fourteen months over an inoperative offside front position lamp and a supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicator fault. The most recent outcome on 7 May 2026 was a pass with only a minor headlamp lens defect noted, but this followed a failure at the same test station just two days earlier on the same lighting item, suggesting either an intermittent bulb or wiring issue rather than a fully resolved repair. Across the 2024 and 2025 tests there is a developing pattern of brake disc wear flagged at both the front and rear axles, an ongoing but not excessive oil leak, and deteriorating suspension arm ball joint dust covers appearing on both the offside and nearside front assemblies. While none of these issues have yet caused a failure, the accumulation of advisories across consecutive tests indicates components approaching the threshold of replacement, and the lighting and airbag system warnings are symptomatic faults that warrant direct verification rather than assumption of a clean bill of health. Mileage accumulation on this vehicle sits at 152,023 miles over thirteen years, equating to roughly 11,694 miles annually and broadly consistent with average commercial or multi-purpose use for its age. There are no extended gaps in the testing record that would suggest a prolonged period off the road, and the annual accumulation appears steady rather than presenting any sudden spikes or long stationary intervals. At this mileage, mechanical wear on a commercial-derived platform of this type typically concentrates on braking consumables, suspension linkages, steering components, and drivetrain mounts, which aligns closely with the advisory items already captured in the MOT history. The combination of high absolute mileage and a thirteen-year service life means that items not directly visible during an MOT, such as clutch wear, gearbox oil seals, and turbocharger condition, merit close physical inspection alongside the documented defect areas. For a prospective buyer, the suspension joint dust cover deterioration on both front arms should be treated as a priority check, as perished covers allow water and grit ingress into the ball joint, accelerating internal wear. On a test drive, listen for clonking or knocking from the front end over uneven surfaces, particularly when turning or traversing speed bumps, and feel for any vagueness or delay in steering response. The worn front and rear brake discs flagged in 2024 and 2025 should be physically inspected for lip measurement, surface scoring, and runout, as the MOT advisory descriptions suggest progressive wear that may now be reaching replacement threshold. Pedal feel should be tested under firm application from speed to detect any judder or pulsation, which would confirm disc runout beyond serviceable limits. The persistent oil leak, although assessed as not excessive in two separate tests, should be traced to its origin on inspection, paying particular attention to engine seals, sump gasket condition, and any residue on surrounding components that might indicate the leak is worsening between tests. The recurring offside front position lamp failure is a comparatively simple item but requires deliberate verification rather than dismissal. The bulb holder, connector integrity, and wiring should be examined for corrosion or poor contact, and the lamp function should be rechecked immediately after the test drive rather than assuming the warning is resolved. The supplementary restraint system warning lamp fault recorded in 2024 represents the more serious electrical concern, as this can indicate a defective airbag, seatbelt pretensioner, crash sensor, or wiring fault within the restraint system, and any diagnostic trouble codes stored in the system should be read and cleared with confirmation of the root cause repair. A visual inspection of the front position lamp assembly is also warranted given the headlamp lens defect noted in May 2026, as moisture ingress can cause both lens misting and adjacent lamp failures. Taken together, the record does not present a vehicle in poor overall condition, but it does present one whose recent test history contains genuine wear items and intermittent electrical faults that require direct verification before purchase.