2009 Ford Kuga 2.0L Diesel · EA59 ATO

The 2009 Ford Kuga’s most recent MOT test on 7 November 2024 confirms it remains roadworthy, with no defects recorded across the past three annual checks. The consistent pass history—spanning September 2021 to November 2024—suggests no major recurring issues were detected by the tester, though the single failure in September 2022 (a duplicate entry with no recorded faults) does not provide meaningful insight. The vehicle’s compliance with emissions and structural checks in each test implies no obvious neglect in critical areas, though the absence of advisories means even minor concerns may have gone unnoticed. For a vehicle of this age and mileage, the lack of failings is notable but does not preclude hidden wear in high-stress components. The recorded mileage of 116,876 miles over 17 years—approximately 6,875 miles annually—falls within the typical range for a car of this age, though it suggests moderate usage rather than intensive service. The most significant gap occurs between the September 2022 failure (or duplicate entry) and the September 2021 pass, where no additional tests are documented, though this could reflect administrative oversight rather than mechanical issues. There is no evidence of rapid mileage accumulation or prolonged periods of inactivity, which might have accelerated wear or caused corrosion. However, the sparse advisories in the record mean routine maintenance—such as fluid changes or suspension inspections—cannot be confirmed. A prospective buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension components, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The brakes, while not explicitly failed, warrant scrutiny for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has been driven in mixed conditions. Corrosion checks are essential, focusing on the wheel arches, sills, and underbody near the exhaust system, as these areas are prone to deterioration in a Kuga of this vintage. The lack of advisories in recent tests does not guarantee these areas are sound, so visual and functional assessments are critical. Additionally, the exhaust system should be inspected for leaks or structural fatigue, as emissions compliance in prior tests does not rule out minor failures.