2011 Nissan Note 1.6L Petrol · EJ11 WSW

The most recent DVSA MOT test for this 2011 Nissan Note was conducted on 8 December 2025 and resulted in a pass, though it followed immediately on the same date after a failed test which recorded several major defects. While the latest pass is reassuring on the surface, the underlying mechanical condition revealed by the same-day failure warrants careful attention, as these items were apparently rectified just before the retest. The maintenance trend over the recorded history shows a broadly stable but progressively deteriorating pattern, with recurring advisory items related to sub-frame pin or bush wear on both sides appearing in 2024 and then escalating into major failure points by 2025. Additional advisories on front brake disc wear across 2021 and 2022 indicate ongoing wear to the braking system, and tyre-related advisories on both nearside and offside fronts in 2024 and 2025 suggest edge wear consistent with potential geometry or suspension concerns. The presence of exhaust emissions and structural exhaust leaks in the latest test points to a vehicle requiring meaningful recent mechanical investment. With recorded mileage of 132,977 miles over approximately fifteen years, this Nissan Note has averaged around 8,865 miles per year, which sits broadly in line with typical usage for a car of this age and class. There are no significant unexplained gaps in the mileage progression between tests, indicating steady rather than sporadic use. At this accumulated mileage, wear-related deterioration of suspension components, engine mountings, clutch assembly, drivetrain seals, and cooling system hoses is expected, particularly on a vehicle that has seen consistent urban and suburban use. The mileage itself is not a disqualifying factor for a well-maintained example of this model, but it does elevate the importance of verifying recent servicing and replacement of high-wear consumables. A prospective buyer should focus closely on the sub-frame pin and bush condition, since this defect progressed from advisory status in 2024 to a fail-level major defect on both sides by late 2025. On a test drive, listen for clonking or knocking noises from the front suspension over speed bumps, uneven road surfaces, and during full-lock manoeuvres, as worn sub-frame bushes allow the powertrain and suspension assembly to shift under load. Inspect both front tyres carefully for uneven shoulder wear, particularly inner-edge wear which is characteristic of worn bushes altering tracking geometry. Ask for documentary evidence of the rectification work carried out between the failed and passed test on 8 December 2025, and confirm whether the sub-frame bushes were replaced or merely reassessed. If replacement was not undertaken, this is an imminent and potentially costly repair, as the work typically requires removal of the sub-frame and may entail associated component replacement. The exhaust Lambda sensor reading failure and major exhaust gas leak recorded in December 2025 indicate that the exhaust system was compromised at the rear section and the catalytic converter or pre-catalyst emissions performance was outside specified limits. On inspection, listen for an audible exhaust drone, ticking from the rear silencer area when the engine is warm, and any smell of exhaust gases entering the cabin, which would suggest a serious leak at joint or flex section. Verify that replacement has been carried out and check under the vehicle for fresh welding or new components. The front brake discs were flagged as worn and pitted across both 2021 and 2022 tests, so on a test drive apply the brakes firmly at low speed to detect any shudder through the steering wheel or pedal, which would indicate disc warping from prolonged use. Additionally, given the vehicle's age, examine all tyres for sidewall cracking and perishing regardless of tread depth, check the 12V battery for secure mounting and terminal condition, and confirm that brake fluid, coolant, and engine oil have been refreshed within their calendar intervals. A full service history with verifiable stamps would substantially strengthen confidence in this vehicle despite its age and the recent advisory and failure history.