2004 Honda CR-V 2.0L Petrol · EN04 JFK

This Honda CR-V has demonstrated a concerning pattern of MOT failures over the past two years, with the most recent test on 11 November 2025—just six months prior to today—yielding a pass despite a prior failure just one day earlier at 202,670 miles. The repeated failures at the 188,000-mile mark in 2024 and the lack of recorded defects in any test suggest either a systematic oversight in the testing process or a vehicle that narrowly avoids serious faults. The absence of advisories or repeated issues in the passed tests implies no consistent mechanical trend, but the two failures within a single month in 2025 warrant scrutiny of components that might have been close to failure thresholds. The mileage progression of roughly 9,200 miles annually aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, though the abrupt accumulation of 14,315 miles between the November 2024 failure and the 2025 test suggests either a period of heavy use or delayed servicing. The 2023 to 2024 gap of 15,195 miles over a year indicates inconsistent mileage accumulation, which could reflect variable ownership or extended periods of inactivity. There are no evident signs of neglect in terms of mileage, but the rapid mileage jumps between tests raise questions about whether critical maintenance was deferred. Given the history, a buyer should prioritise an inspection of the braking system, particularly the rear calipers and discs, as the 2025 failures may have stemmed from binding or uneven wear. The suspension—including coil springs, bushes, and dampers—should be examined for excessive play or corrosion, as these components often fail intermittently without clear MOT advisories. Structural integrity, especially around the wheel arches and sills, must be assessed for corrosion, as this model is prone to rust-related issues after 150,000 miles. The exhaust system should also be checked for leaks or excessive rust, as emissions-related failures are common in older CR-Vs. Finally, the condition of the tyres, despite no MOT mention, should be verified, as the lack of tread-related failures does not guarantee they have been consistently replaced.