2010 Ford Mondeo 2.0L Diesel · EO60 ABV

A chronic pattern of rear suspension and subframe advisories, combined with a single structural failure in late 2023, defines the mechanical story of this Mondeo. Across the four recorded tests spanning 2022 to 2025, the vehicle has passed three times but carries a recurring catalogue of corrosion advisories, most notably on the front subframe, which has been flagged at every single test. The rear suspension architecture is the more pressing concern: a 2023 failure was recorded for an offside rear lower suspension arm described as corroded and seriously weakened, and the accompanying advisories at that same test noted worn trailing arm bushes on both sides. While the two subsequent tests passed cleanly, they still carry advisories for trailing arm bush wear and underseal covering various suspension components, suggesting the underlying condition has not been resolved but has merely deteriorated to a level still within legal limits. The latest pass in October 2025 introduces a new advisory for worn, pitted front brake discs and once again repeats the front subframe corrosion note, indicating that chassis corrosion is a persistent and progressive issue rather than a one-off finding. With 112,171 miles recorded over a 16-year life, this Mondeo averages approximately 7,000 miles per year, which sits broadly in line with typical usage for a car of this age and class. The MOT history is consistent in its annual testing cadence with no significant gaps in recorded mileage, suggesting the vehicle has remained in regular use rather than being laid up for extended periods. At this accumulated mileage, wear on consumables such as brake components, suspension linkages, and drivetrain mounts is to be expected, and the front brake disc advisory on the most recent test aligns with that level of use. The mileage is neither unusually low nor excessively high, and there are no recorded sharp jumps or unusual plateaus that would suggest a clocks discrepancy or a prolonged period off the road. For a prospective buyer, the priority areas for physical inspection are the rear suspension and the chassis structure. The trailing arm bushes on both sides, the rear coil spring mounting areas, and the offside rear lower arm should all be examined closely for play, cracking, or further corrosion progression. On a test drive, listen for clonking or knocking from the rear over uneven surfaces, particularly over speed bumps or potholes, and feel for any vagueness or wandering from the rear end that could indicate worn bushes or weakened arms. A vehicle lift would be strongly advisable to confirm the extent of the subframe corrosion, as the front subframe has been flagged at every test and the rear subframe is noted as being concealed by underseal, which can mask the true condition of the metal underneath. Any further corrosion at the attachment points or mounting brackets should be treated as a serious concern given the established pattern. The front brake discs should be inspected for lipping, scoring, and minimum thickness, as the advisory suggests they are nearing the end of their service life and a further year of use is likely to have worn them further. The nearside front headlamp aim was a failure item in 2023, so checking both headlamps for correct alignment on dip beam is worthwhile, particularly if the vehicle has been driven on uneven roads. Beyond the flagged items, a thorough inspection underneath for any fluid leaks from the engine, gearbox, or power steering is sensible at this mileage, as is checking the condition of the exhaust mounting and any brake pipes for surface corrosion, given the general age of the vehicle. The overall picture is one of a high-mileage family saloon with known structural vulnerabilities that are being monitored rather than fully rectified, and any purchase decision should weigh the cost of likely rear suspension refurbishment against the value of the car.