2016 Ford S-MAX 2.0L Diesel · EY66 OOJ

This 2016 Ford S-Max has maintained a consistent MOT pass record with no defects recorded across the last five annual tests, most recently passing on 18 November 2024. The absence of advisories or failings suggests the vehicle has not experienced any recurring mechanical issues that would indicate neglect or impending failure. However, the most recent test occurred just over nine months ago, placing it beyond the optimal window for pre-purchase inspection, particularly given its age and mileage. While the MOT history is clean, the lack of advisories does not preclude hidden wear—such as progressive suspension degradation, brake binding, or corrosion—common in vehicles of this age and usage pattern. The recorded mileage of 72,641 miles aligns with typical annual usage for a vehicle of this vintage, averaging around 7,264 miles per year. There are no evident gaps or spikes in mileage between tests, though the data only spans five intervals. Without earlier records, it’s impossible to confirm whether the vehicle was lightly used prior to 2021 or if it has consistently accrued mileage at this rate. The steady progression suggests regular driving habits, which may have contributed to predictable wear rather than sudden mechanical stress. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear components that often fail without pre-MOT warnings. The suspension—particularly rear coil springs, bushes, and shock absorbers—should be checked for uneven sagging or excessive play, as these are common failure points in vehicles of this age. Brake systems, including caliper binding, uneven disc wear, and master cylinder condition, warrant scrutiny, especially if the vehicle has been driven hard or exposed to moisture. Structural integrity, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, should be examined for corrosion or rust penetration, which can compromise safety without immediate MOT failings. Tyre condition, including tread depth and lateral wear patterns, should also be verified, as the absence of MOT failings does not guarantee they have been consistently maintained.