2010 Toyota Aygo 1.0L Petrol · FE60 FWX

Corrosion and a recent structural safety failure dominate the vehicle’s MOT history, with recurring advisories for rear brake pipe rust, rear suspension mounting corrosion and under‑body rust, compounded by a major failure on the near‑side rear outer seat‑belt anchorage recorded in the July 2026 test. The pattern shows a gradual build‑up of rust‑related issues rather than an isolated incident, and the seat‑belt anchorage failure indicates a component that may have been compromised beyond simple surface corrosion. Although the latest test was passed, the presence of a major safety defect in the same test cycle suggests that remedial work was required to bring the car back to compliance. At 120,490 miles over roughly sixteen years the average annual mileage sits at about 7,500 mi, which aligns with typical usage for a small city car of this age. The MOT record shows a consistent testing interval of twelve months with no significant gaps, indicating the vehicle has been regularly presented for inspection. The mileage level implies that wear items such as suspension bushings, brake discs and drivetrain components will be well into their service lives, and the cumulative exposure to the identified corrosion zones may have accelerated degradation of those parts. Prospective buyers should focus the inspection on the brake system and rear suspension. Examine the rear brake pipes for any signs of external rust, pitting or grease residue and listen for a soft or spongy pedal feel that could indicate internal corrosion. Check the rear suspension mounting areas for flaking rust or cracked mounting plates, and on a drive over bumps listen for clunking or excessive bounce that would betray worn bushings or compromised arm pins. The front inner brake disc was flagged as pitted; feel for any pedal pulsation at higher speeds and inspect the disc surface for deep scoring that could necessitate replacement. The anti‑roll bar pins on the near‑side front and rear suspension arms were noted as worn – assess steering response for looseness or a vague knocking sensation when cornering. The seat‑belt anchorage on the near‑side rear must be inspected thoroughly; verify that the belt retracts cleanly, locks securely under load and shows no excessive play at the anchorage point. The off‑side front mirror damage and defective wiper blade are minor but should be rectified for full compliance. Given the extent of corrosion and the major seat‑belt issue, budgeting for replacement of the rear brake pipes, corrosion‑affected suspension mounting brackets and possibly the rear seat‑belt anchorage is prudent. A full mechanical appraisal by a qualified technician before purchase will confirm whether the observed wear is limited to surface rust or has progressed to structural weakening that could affect safety and long‑term reliability.