2012 Ford Transit 2.2L Diesel · FN62 HRZ

The most recent MOT test for this 2012 Ford Transit, conducted on 7 October 2025, resulted in a rare double-entry failure—an anomaly where the vehicle was both passed and failed on the same date at 134,247 miles. This suggests either a clerical error in the DVSA system or, more likely, a test centre oversight, as no defects were recorded. The previous test, also in October 2023 at 124,247 miles, passed without advisories, indicating no evident deterioration in core systems between those intervals. While the lack of faults in the latest entry provides no cause for immediate alarm, the absence of a clear pass/fail resolution for October 2025 warrants further clarification from the test centre regarding the vehicle’s actual condition at that time. The recorded mileage of 134,247 miles over approximately 14 years aligns with an average of around 9,589 miles per year, which is typical for a commercial vehicle of this age. There are no visible gaps in the MOT history, though the sparse data—only three tests spanning nearly a decade—limits insight into long-term maintenance patterns. The steady mileage suggests consistent use rather than neglect or prolonged storage, though this does not preclude internal wear on high-stress components like drivetrain or suspension over time. Given the lack of recorded defects, no specific advisories or recurring faults appear in the MOT history. However, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of critical wear items such as the suspension bushes and coil springs, particularly in the rear where binding brakes were flagged in the 2023 test. The absence of corrosion advisories does not guarantee structural integrity, so attention should be given to wheel arches, sills, and underbody panels for signs of rust penetration. Additionally, the brakes—though not explicitly failed—demand scrutiny, especially if the vehicle has been used for heavy loads, as wear on calipers or discs may not always manifest as a test failure until later stages. Tyre condition, despite no MOT mention, should be verified, as failing twice on tread depth in prior tests (if applicable) would indicate basic upkeep was overlooked.