2019 Audi Q2 1.5L Petrol · GS19 GJS

Across five recorded MOT tests spanning 2022 through 2026, this Audi Q2 has passed every annual inspection without a single failure or refusal, presenting a continuous pattern of roadworthiness compliance. The defining feature of the record is the recurrence of two specific advisories on the nearside rear tyre (slight damage, cracking or perishing) alongside a minor windscreen damage notation, both of which have appeared identically on the two most recent tests in April 2025 and April 2026. While these items did not constitute failure, the duplication of the same tyre advisory two years running suggests a component that may be approaching the end of its service life and warrants careful inspection at the point of purchase. Otherwise, the intervening tests in 2022, 2023 and 2024 recorded no advisories or defects at all, indicating a stable mechanical condition with no emerging structural or systemic issues flagged by the examiner. With 46,068 miles recorded over approximately seven years, the Q2 has averaged around 6,581 miles annually, which sits squarely within the typical usage band for a vehicle of this age and class. There are no significant gaps between annual tests and no evidence of long periods off the road, which means the braking, suspension, drivetrain and exhaust components have experienced regular, consistent service rather than the sporadic use that can accelerate rubber degradation or promote corrosion from standing. Mileage progression appears steady across the documented period, and there is nothing in the record to suggest an unusually heavy accumulation that would point to elevated wear on high-mileage consumables such as clutches, dual-mass flywheels or turbocharger components. For a prospective buyer, the priority attention should fall on the items that have already drawn examiner comments. The nearside rear tyre should be inspected closely for sidewall cracking, perishing, bulging, or impact damage, and a check of the tread depth across the full circumference is worthwhile given that the same wheel has been flagged twice. The windscreen should be examined for the location and extent of the damage, ensuring any chips or cracks sit outside the driver's primary line of sight and have not extended toward critical edge zones. On a test drive, listen for any knocking or clonking from the rear suspension over uneven surfaces, which could indicate worn bushes or coil spring fatigue given the vehicle's age, and check for pulling under braking that might suggest binding rear calipers or uneven pad wear. Beyond the advisory items, a thorough pre-purchase inspection should include a raised examination of the underbody and subframe areas for any corrosion, particularly around suspension mounting points and brake pipe runs, as these are common ageing concerns on vehicles entering their eighth year. Brake discs and pads should be measured for remaining service material, and the electronic parking brake function confirmed on an incline. With the Q2's relatively modest annual mileage, the cambelt replacement interval status (manufacturer schedule typically around every 4 to 5 years depending on engine variant) and the condition of the timing chain where applicable should be verified through service documentation, as MOT records alone do not confirm internal engine service history. Finally, a diagnostic scan for any stored fault codes in the ABS, airbag, emissions and infotainment systems would provide additional reassurance that the electronic control modules are functioning within parameters, even though none of these areas have been flagged during statutory testing.