2010 Alfa Romeo Mito 1.4L Petrol · HJ10 SVC

The Alfa Romeo Mito’s most recent MOT history reveals a concerning pattern of instability in roadworthiness, with two consecutive failures in November 2023 and November 2025—despite identical mileages at both failure points (101,979 and 110,558 miles respectively). The November 2025 failure, just seven days before passing, suggests either a rushed repair or a recurring issue that evaded detection. The lack of recorded defects on either failure test implies the tester may have missed critical faults, or the vehicle’s condition deteriorated rapidly between tests. The November 2025 pass, with no defects noted, does not provide confidence in the vehicle’s current state, particularly given the 110,569 miles logged—well beyond the typical lifespan of many suspension and drivetrain components in this model. The mileage progression of 6,911 miles annually over 16 years aligns with average usage for a vehicle of this age, though the abrupt gap between the 2024 and 2025 tests—spanning exactly one year—raises questions about whether the vehicle was driven consistently or stood unused during that period. The identical mileage at both 2023 failure tests (101,979 miles) suggests either a deliberate reset or a period of negligible use, which could mask underlying issues. Without intermediate maintenance records, it is impossible to confirm whether critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake calipers were serviced or replaced during this time. Given the history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear, where binding or uneven wear is often a silent failure point in this model. The repeated failures at identical mileages hint at a recurring mechanical issue, possibly linked to worn steering rack components, corroded suspension mounts, or degraded brake pads and discs. Corrosion checks at wheel arches, subframe, and sills are essential, as are tests for fluid leaks (brakes, power steering, and coolant) that could indicate neglected maintenance. The absence of advisories in the MOT history does not guarantee these areas are sound—it merely means they were not flagged during testing. Independent verification of brake binding, suspension play, and structural rigidity is non-negotiable.