The most recent MOT test for this 2004 Ford Mondeo was conducted on 2014-08-08 and resulted in a failure, with three "Dangerous Fail" items—specifically, the parking brake system failing efficiency and offside rear brake engagement, alongside a broken offside front coil spring. This marks a significant deviation from the vehicle’s prior MOT history, where the majority of tests either passed or showed only minor advisories or user-entered defects. The failure in 2014 suggests either a sudden mechanical failure or a poorly maintained condition that was not addressed before that test, indicating a concerning trend of escalating issues rather than a stable maintenance record. The earlier failures in 2012 and 2013—particularly those related to brake pipe corrosion, exposed tyre cords, and exhaust leaks—highlight persistent mechanical wear, while the 2011 tests revealed early signs of corrosion on brake discs and structural deterioration in the exhaust system. These recurring themes point to either a lack of proactive servicing or underlying wear patterns that have progressed beyond the point of minor advisories.
The recorded mileage of 169,417 miles for a vehicle aged approximately 22 years represents an average annual usage of around 7,701 miles, which is relatively typical for a Mondeo of this era, though not exceptionally high. At 22 years old, such mileage does not necessarily indicate excessive wear if the vehicle has been maintained properly, but it does suggest prolonged exposure to road conditions that accelerate component degradation—particularly in suspension, brakes, and exhaust systems. The absence of recent high-mileage spikes suggests steady, perhaps moderate, usage rather than rapid wear-out, but the historical MOT failures indicate that some components have reached critical thresholds. For instance, the broken coil spring and severe brake pipe corrosion at 169,417 miles imply that these parts were not replaced in time, which is a red flag for either neglect or an inability to budget for routine servicing. The 2013 advisory on rear sub-frame bush deterioration also suggests that suspension components may be nearing the end of their serviceable life, warranting closer inspection.
Given the vehicle’s MOT history, the prospective buyer should prioritise a thorough mechanical inspection to confirm the severity of the issues identified. Start with the parking brake system , as the 2014 failure indicates a potentially unsafe condition where the rear brake engagement is unreliable. Listen for uneven brake pedal travel or a spongy feel when engaging the parking brake, and check for any visible corrosion or fluid leaks around the brake lines and calipers. The broken offside front coil spring and deteriorated rear sub-frame bush will require inspection for structural integrity; clunking noises from the suspension during cornering or bumps, and uneven ride height, are clear indicators of these failures. The exhaust system should be examined for leaks, particularly around the centre exhaust and outer casing, as the 2013 and 2012 failures highlight major defects that could lead to emissions violations or carbon monoxide leaks. Inspect for rust or corrosion on the exhaust components, as well as any unusual noises or vibrations when accelerating.
For the brake system , the history of corrosion on brake pipes and discs demands immediate attention. The 2012 and 2013 failures show that the pipes were excessively corroded, which could compromise hydraulic pressure and lead to brake failure. Check for binding calipers, uneven brake disc wear, or a shuddering sensation when braking, which may indicate warping or glazing. The tyres should be thoroughly inspected for exposed cords or tread depth below 1.6mm, as the 2014 MOT failure highlights a critical safety risk. Even if the tread appears adequate, the 2013 failures suggest the tyres may have internal damage from excessive flexing or poor alignment. Finally, given the vehicle’s age and the lack of recent service records, consider checking the 12V battery for capacity, as standing vehicles can suffer from sulphate buildup or fluid loss. Inspect the coolant, brake fluid, and engine oil for signs of degradation or contamination, as these fluids can break down over time, especially if the vehicle has been stored or used intermittently. If the vehicle has been driven regularly, a full service history should be reviewed to confirm compliance with Ford’s recommended maintenance intervals, particularly for the CV joints, suspension components, and exhaust system. If any of these issues are confirmed, prioritise replacing the coil spring, brake pipes, and exhaust components without delay to restore roadworthiness and safety.