2010 Peugeot Boxer 2.2L Diesel · KM10 AAF

The Peugeot Boxer presents a clean MOT history over the past three years, with no defects recorded in any of the five tests—four of which passed and one failed on the same date in both 2024 and 2025. The most recent test in August 2025 at 164,257 miles confirms the vehicle remains free of major mechanical or structural issues, suggesting consistent upkeep or a well-maintained example. The repeated failures on the same day in consecutive years are unusual but technically non-fatal, as no defects were cited, implying possible administrative or procedural errors rather than mechanical concerns. This stability in test outcomes, combined with the absence of advisories or recurring faults, points to a vehicle that has either been meticulously serviced or luckily avoided significant wear beyond typical consumable items. The mileage accumulation aligns closely with the vehicle’s age, averaging around 10,266 miles per year—a rate that suggests moderate but not excessive use. The recorded mileage jumps from 118,905 miles in August 2023 to 141,472 in August 2024, then to 164,257 in August 2025, indicating steady but not aggressive driving habits. There are no red flags in the spacing between tests; each MOT was completed within the 12-month window, and the mileage increments are consistent with a vehicle that has seen regular, if not particularly heavy, service. The lack of rapid mileage spikes or prolonged gaps between tests further supports the impression of responsible ownership or a fleet/lease history where maintenance was prioritised. Given the absence of defects or advisories in the MOT records, a prospective buyer should still conduct a thorough pre-purchase inspection, focusing on components not routinely checked during MOTs. Particular attention should be given to the suspension—specifically the condition of coil springs, anti-roll bars, and bushings—since these are not always flagged unless visibly worn or damaged. The braking system, including caliper condition, brake fluid integrity, and disc thickness, should be checked for signs of uneven wear or binding, even though the MOT history shows no issues. Structural integrity, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and underbody panels, should be scrutinised for corrosion or fatigue cracks, as these can develop silently over time. While the MOT records offer reassurance, a hands-on inspection will reveal whether the vehicle’s interior and exterior have been similarly well cared for beyond the legal minimum.