2017 Mercedes-Benz A-Class 2.1L Diesel · KU17 AFN

The vehicle’s most recent MOT test on 2026-04-22 confirms it remains roadworthy, though the presence of perishing near- and offside front tyres—despite passing—indicates a critical maintenance oversight. This is the first defect recorded since 2022, suggesting a recent deterioration in tyre condition rather than a long-term trend. The 2025 and 2024 tests showed no faults, which implies the vehicle was otherwise well-maintained during that period, though the current tyres are now at risk of failure. Buyers should prioritise verifying whether the tyres have been replaced since the last test or if they remain in service despite the MOT’s conditional pass. The mileage progression reveals a steady but typical usage pattern for a vehicle of this age, averaging around 8,856 miles annually. The largest gap between tests occurs between 2022 (44,271 miles) and 2024 (67,971 miles), a span of 24 months with 23,700 miles accumulated—a rate of nearly 10,000 miles per year. While this is higher than the overall average, it does not indicate excessive wear beyond what might be expected for a well-used car. The absence of earlier MOT records means there is no historical context for earlier maintenance habits, but the consistent passing tests suggest no major mechanical neglect. Given the recent tyre defects, an immediate inspection of the front tyres is essential to confirm their current tread depth and structural integrity, as perishing can compromise grip and handling. The lack of prior faults does not preclude the need to check suspension components—particularly the front struts and bushes—for excessive wear or fluid leaks, as these are common failure points at this mileage. Additionally, the braking system should be scrutinised for uneven pad wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has been driven aggressively. Structural corrosion, particularly around wheel arches and sills, should also be examined, as Mercedes-Benz A-Class models from this era are prone to rust development in wet conditions. The absence of advisories in recent tests does not guarantee these areas are clear, so a thorough visual and functional assessment is advised.