Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid

2002 Rover 45 2.0L Diesel · KU52 PYP

KU52 PYP

2002 Rover 45 (2.0L, diesel). First registered 01/09/2002. Recorded mileage 65,406 miles. MOT valid until 28/11/2026. Currently declared SORN.

Make & Model
ROVER 45
Year / Origin
2002 · Northampton
MOT Status
Valid until 28/11/2026
Road Tax
SORN
Recorded Mileage
65,406 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Non-Compliant (Pre-Euro 6 Diesel)
Fuel & Engine
DIESEL · 2.0L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 28/11/2026
Tax Status
SORN
Statutory Off Road (SORN)
Fuel Type
DIESEL
Year
2002
Engine
1994cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The vehicle remains in a roadworthy state but exhibits a clear trend of deteriorating structural and mechanical condition. While the most recent test in November 2025 at 65,406 miles passed, it carried multiple advisories regarding worn suspension arm bushes and deteriorated components. The history shows a significant regression point in late 2024 where the car failed multiple tests due to serious structural corrosion and exhaust failures. Although these specific faults were rectified to secure a pass, the underlying issue of underbody oxidation remains a persistent concern. The recorded mileage of 65,406 miles is exceptionally low for a 24-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 2,725 miles per year. However, the data reveals a gap in usage between October 2023 (55,235 miles) and 2024 (63,212 miles), where the car covered over 8,000 miles relatively quickly. This low usage often correlates with the age-related degradation of rubber components, such as the recurring worn bushes and CV boots noted throughout the record. A buyer must prioritize a physical inspection of the subframe mounting areas and floor pan, as the 2024 failure highlighted excessive corrosion that significantly reduced structural strength. While the subsequent test noted this as no longer excessive, the presence of general underbody corrosion suggests the process is active. The buyer should also verify the offside front drive shaft CV boot, which was flagged as severely deteriorated in late 2025, to prevent imminent drives joint failure. The persistent oil leak noted since 2024 also requires close monitoring to determine if it is a minor gasket seep or a more significant seal failure.

KU52 PYP Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 25/11/2025
  • 65,406 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 6 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring suspension items (13 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
70
/ 100 · Average
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Average

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for KU52PYP

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

Reliability & Known Issues

Known faults for Rover Rover 45

Our database tracks 4 specific mechanical faults and recurring failure patterns identified across UK MOT testing stations for this generation.

KU52 PYP Mileage History

  1. 05/10/202355,235 mi
  2. 09/10/202463,212 mi+7,977 mi
  3. 22/11/202463,255 mi+43 mi
  4. 29/11/202463,255 mi
  5. 25/11/202565,406 mi+2,151 mi

Average of roughly 4,751 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

KU52 PYP MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 13 Jun 2026, 18:31
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2002 Rover 45 (KU52 PYP) between October 2023 and November 2025.

The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 25 November 2025 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Suspension (13 issues), Lighting (7 issues), Exhaust & Emissions (3 issues), Bodywork (1 issue), Steering (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 23 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))”; “Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”; “Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY