2022 Volvo XC90 R-Design B5 Mhev AWD Auto 2.0L Hybrid electric (clean) · KV22 YVB

A recurring pattern of tyre damage and rear‑brake‑pad wear defines this XC90’s recent MOT history, yet the June 2026 test recorded a clean pass with no recorded defects. Earlier in March 2026 the car failed because a near‑side front tyre had a cut deep enough to reach the ply, and the same session flagged thin rear brake pads and minor cuts on the off‑side front and rear tyres. A subsequent MOT a day later downgraded those issues to advisories only, and the most recent June inspection found none of them present, indicating that the critical tyre fault was likely remedied and the brake‑pad wear remains borderline. At 78,432 mi the vehicle averages roughly 19,600 mi per annum, a mileage rate well above the typical UK average for a four‑year‑old SUV. Such utilisation accelerates wear on consumables such as brake pads, tyres and suspension components, and it also places greater demand on the drivetrain and differential. There are no gaps in the MOT record, but the high annual accumulation suggests the car has been driven extensively, which should be reflected in the condition of wear items even if they have not yet triggered a failure. Prospective buyers should inspect the tyre set thoroughly for any cuts, bulges or uneven tread wear, particularly on the off‑side front and rear where advisory cuts were previously noted. Verify that the near‑side front tyre has been replaced and that the remaining tyres are free of nails or punctures; a simple visual check and a tyre‑pressure gauge reading will confirm current condition. On a test drive, listen for any thumping or vibration that could indicate a compromised sidewall, and feel for a steady, firm pedal response – thin rear pads often manifest as a higher pedal travel, reduced bite and occasional squeal under hard braking. The rear‑brake‑pad advisory persists, so a brake‑pad thickness check is advisable; any pad thickness below the recommended minimum will require replacement and may be accompanied by slight pedal judder if the pads are uneven. The rear oil‑leak advisory, though not classified as excessive, warrants a visual inspection of the differential housing for fresh oil stains and a check of the oil level during a service. Given the mileage and the history of tyre and brake advisories, budgeting for new tyres, rear brake‑pad replacement and a differential seal inspection would be prudent before committing to purchase.