2010 Nissan Micra 1.2L Petrol · LL10 RCV

A single dangerous failure on both front tyres during the August 2025 test is the only blemish in an otherwise unblemished MOT record, and the vehicle has since passed two further tests in August 2025 and August 2026 with no advisories recorded. The pattern shows that aside from one isolated tyre-related incident, this 2010 Nissan Micra has demonstrated consistent roadworthiness over six consecutive annual tests from 2020 onwards, with the advisory relating to front brake pads in 2020 representing the only flagged wear item. Given the age of the vehicle, the absence of recurring corrosion advisories, suspension component wear, exhaust concerns, or structural defects across the entire testing history is notable, and the post-failure clean tests suggest the tyre issue was addressed rather than indicating a broader neglect pattern. The recorded mileage of 39,154 miles over a 16-year period equates to an annual accumulation of roughly 2,447 miles, which is substantially below the typical usage rate for a car of this age. This low-mileage profile has direct mechanical implications: while the engine, gearbox, and drivetrain will have experienced reduced wear from cumulative distance, prolonged periods of low use can bring their own concerns. Brake discs and pads, particularly those at the front which were flagged in 2020, can suffer from surface corrosion and uneven wear patterns when a vehicle sees only light use, and rubber components such as bushes, drive belts, and coolant hoses harden with age regardless of mileage. The fact that the 2020 advisory has not recurred on subsequent tests suggests the pads were replaced at that point, but a buyer should be aware that brake discs on a low-mileage car may have corroded or developed lipped edges over time even without high friction wear. For a prospective buyer, the priority checks should centre on the specific components that have either been flagged historically or are likely to show age-related deterioration on a vehicle of this profile. On a test drive, listen for any knocking or clonking from the front suspension over uneven road surfaces, as worn suspension linkages and bushes do not always register on an MOT until the deterioration is significant. Apply the brakes firmly from a moderate speed and feel for any judder through the pedal or vibration through the steering wheel, which would indicate warped or corroded front brake discs, a common issue on low-mileage vehicles. Check the steering for any pull to one side under braking, which can suggest a binding caliper or uneven pad wear, and inspect the inner and outer faces of all four wheels for visible corrosion on the brake discs. The tyres themselves, which caused the only failure, should be examined for both tread depth across the full width of each tyre and for any signs of cracking or perishing in the sidewalls given the vehicle's age. Beyond the braking and suspension systems, a thorough inspection should include a check for oil leaks from the engine and gearbox, which can develop on older vehicles regardless of mileage, and a visual examination of the underside for any corrosion on structural components, subframe, and brake or fuel lines, none of which have been flagged in the MOT history to date. Examine all coolant hoses and drive belts for signs of brittleness or cracking, as these deteriorate with age rather than use, and verify that the cooling system functions correctly with no signs of overheating. Finally, inspect the exhaust system for any blowing joints or corrosion, particularly around the mounting points, and confirm that all exterior lights, wipers, and washers operate correctly. Given the clean MOT history apart from the single tyre failure, the mechanical story of this vehicle is one of light use and largely trouble-free testing, but a physical inspection should focus on the age-related rather than mileage-related deterioration that low annual accumulation can mask.