2013 Ford Kuga 2.0L Diesel · LS13 PKF

The 2013 Ford Kuga’s most recent MOT test on 2025-05-14 confirms it remains roadworthy with no defects recorded, though the immediate preceding test on 2023-05-11 was a rare failure—despite no defects being listed, which suggests either a non-critical advisory was overlooked or an administrative error. The trend since 2022-05-10 has been stable, with consistent annual passes at regular intervals, indicating no recurring mechanical issues were severe enough to trigger repeated failures. The absence of advisories or major faults in the last three tests implies the vehicle has likely undergone basic maintenance, though the 2023 failure warrants scrutiny of whether critical components were overlooked or if the test itself was unusually lenient. The recorded mileage of 67,378 miles over 13 years—approximately 5,183 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either minimal use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the 2022 and 2023 tests (just one day apart) is unusual and may indicate a rushed or repeated attempt, though both tests showed no defects. The consistency in mileage increments (around 4,000 miles per year) suggests the vehicle has not been subjected to heavy or erratic usage, which could imply deferred maintenance risks such as seized components or degraded fluids. However, the low mileage also means some wear items—like suspension bushes or brake pads—may still have significant life remaining, though this cannot be confirmed without inspection. Given the lack of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an in-person examination of suspension components, particularly the rear, as the 2023 failure (despite no listed issues) could hint at underlying concerns. Check for uneven tyre wear, which might indicate alignment or suspension drift, and inspect coil springs and bushes for cracking or excessive play. Brake discs and calipers should be examined for binding or excessive corrosion, especially if the vehicle has stood for extended periods. Structural integrity—particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe—should be assessed for corrosion, as rust can compromise safety-critical elements over time. The absence of advisories in recent tests does not guarantee these areas are flawless, so thorough visual and functional checks are essential.