2021 Renault Clio Iconic TCE 1.0L Petrol · MM71 HHX

The most recent DVSA MOT test on 2026-02-18 resulted in a passing outcome, though it included an advisory for brake squeal from the front, which the inspector attributed to potential shims catching on the non-serviceable front (NSF) brake pads. This follows a previous MOT failure in 2026-02-17 where the offside front anti-roll bar linkage ball joint was deemed excessively worn, a critical failure under 5.3.4(a)(i) of the DVSA standards. While the 2024-12-19 MOT was clean, the pattern suggests a recurring issue with front suspension and braking components, indicating either underlying wear progression or a need for closer attention to these systems. The presence of both a major failure and an advisory in the same year, despite the intervening clean test, raises concerns about either inconsistent maintenance or latent wear that has only recently become apparent. Buyers should treat this as a red flag for potential long-term reliability risks, particularly in the front anti-roll bar linkage and brake assembly, warranting immediate inspection of these areas. The vehicle’s recorded mileage of 47,278 miles for a 2021 model represents a reasonable annual usage rate of approximately 9,456 miles per year, which aligns with typical driving patterns for a car of this age and class. However, the gap between the 2024 MOT and the subsequent failures in early 2026—over a period of roughly 18 months—could imply either a period of higher-than-average usage or a lack of routine maintenance during that interval. If the mileage accumulation was consistent, the wear on suspension components like the ball joint and anti-roll bar linkage may have accelerated during that time, exacerbating the issues detected. Conversely, if the car was stored for extended periods, standing corrosion could have developed in the brake system, particularly around the NSF components, contributing to the squeal advisory. Regardless, the combination of moderate mileage and recent MOT failures suggests that the vehicle has been subjected to wear that has not yet been fully addressed. Given the recurring issues with the front anti-roll bar linkage ball joint and brake squeal, the prospective buyer should conduct a thorough inspection of these systems before purchase. On a test drive, listen for persistent clunking or rattling noises from the front suspension, especially when cornering or over bumps, as these could indicate further wear in the anti-roll bar linkage or associated bushings. The brake squeal advisory warrants closer inspection of the NSF brake pads and shims—check for uneven wear patterns or signs of shim binding, which could lead to reduced braking efficiency or premature pad failure. Additionally, visually inspect the front suspension for signs of oil leaks around the ball joint, which could accelerate its deterioration. If the ball joint is confirmed to be worn beyond the 5.3.4(a)(i) threshold, replacement is mandatory, and the buyer should budget for this repair immediately. In the absence of immediate repairs, the vehicle’s roadworthiness is compromised, and further use is not advisable until the defect is rectified. For a vehicle of this age and mileage, the buyer should also perform a comprehensive physical inspection of the vehicle’s structural and fluid-based components. Given the 5-year age and 47,278 miles, the tyres should be checked for sidewall perishing or cracking, which can occur from prolonged exposure to UV light or low temperatures, even if the tread depth remains adequate. The 12-volt battery should be tested for charge retention and overall health, as older vehicles are more prone to battery failure, particularly if the car has been stored for extended periods. The brake discs should be inspected for corrosion or binding, especially if the vehicle has been stationary for long periods, as standing corrosion can cause uneven wear or seize the calipers. Fluid levels, including the brake fluid reservoir, should be checked for contamination or degradation, as brake fluid can absorb moisture over time, reducing its effectiveness. Finally, the service history should be verified for compliance with Renault’s recommended maintenance intervals, particularly for fluid changes and filter replacements, to ensure that time-based wear management has been properly addressed. If the service book is incomplete or missing, the buyer should request evidence of these services to mitigate future reliability risks.