IsItAGoodCar
Official DVLA Record

2005 Peugeot 107 1.0L Petrol · ND55 WCC

ND55 WCC

2005 Peugeot 107 (1.0L, petrol). First registered 21/11/2005. Recorded mileage 92,913 miles. MOT status: Failed.

Make & Model
PEUGEOT 107
Year / Origin
2005 · Newcastle
Safety Recall
Unknown
MOT Status
Failed
Road Tax
—
Recorded Mileage
92,913 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 1.0L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Failed
No test records found
Tax Status
Checking...
Checking DVLA database...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2005
Engine
998cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

A pattern of progressive structural corrosion dominates the mechanical history of this 2005 Peugeot 107 and represents the primary risk for any prospective buyer. The 2022-05-31 test resulted in a failure with major defects recorded against the offside front subframe and offside rear inner sill, both flagged as excessively corroded and significantly reducing structural strength in the prescribed suspension mounting areas. This was the culmination of a corrosion trajectory visible from at least 2018, when advisories first noted rear suspension mounting area corrosion on both sides, followed by a 2019 failure listing four major corrosion defects across nearside and offside rear outer sills and chassis, then a 2020 advisory on front subframe corrosion, and finally the 2022 majors. The latest record also lists major defects for ineffective wiper operation and inoperative direction indicators and hazard warning lamps, alongside the structural items. Across the recorded period, advisories on brake pipe corrosion at the offside rear appeared in both 2018 and 2020, the 2020 test additionally noted general brake hose ferrule corrosion, and rear tyre perishing was advised in 2019. The overall trajectory is one of deterioration rather than improvement, with structural corrosion repeatedly escalating from advisory to failure category. The recorded mileage of 92,913 miles across approximately 21 years equates to a usage rate of roughly 4,424 miles annually, which is low for the vehicle's age and points to either modest annual use or extended periods of standing. Testing history is unevenly distributed, with passes in 2016, 2017, and 2018, followed by a failure and pass in late 2019, a failure and pass in late 2020, and then no recorded test activity until the failure in May 2022, leaving a near two-year gap before the most recent entry. Mechanically, lower annual mileage on a vehicle of this age typically reduces wear on internal drivetrain components but can accelerate corrosion due to prolonged exposure without regular use drying out moisture, which is consistent with the chronic structural and brake pipe corrosion pattern observed in the record. The combination of low mileage, intermittent testing, and rising corrosion advisories suggests the vehicle has spent significant time stationary or underused, conditions that often allow moisture ingress into cavities and subframes to progress unchecked. A prospective buyer should focus the pre-purchase inspection heavily on the structural mounting areas flagged throughout the record. The offside front subframe was recorded as excessively corroded in 2022 and had shown signs of corrosion two years earlier, so the subframe itself, its mounting points, and the surrounding inner wings should be examined closely with a torch for perforation, flaking, or patch repairs; a sharp tap with a screwdriver or the heel of the hand will reveal the difference between surface scaling and through-section loss. The inner and outer sills at the rear, the rear chassis rails, and the inner floor should be inspected on a lift if possible, as the record shows these areas have been flagged on multiple occasions across both nearside and offside. Suspension arm ball joints at both front sides were excessively worn at the 2020 test, so any knocking or clonking from the front when traversing speed humps or potholes, or vague steering with clunks over uneven surfaces, would warrant immediate investigation of the front lower arms and bushes. The braking system also warrants direct attention given the repeated advisories. The offside rear brake pipe was advised in 2016 and 2018 and the hoses were noted with slightly corroded ferrules in 2020, so the full length of the underbody brake lines, particularly at the rear and around any chassis brackets, should be inspected for flaking, blistering, or weeping at joints; a firm pedal that spongy-feels or drops under sustained pressure could indicate compromised pipes. On a test drive, listen for binding calipers or uneven braking that pulls the vehicle to one side, and check that the handbrake holds on an incline. The headlamp aim defects recorded in 2019 and 2020, and the 2022 major for inoperative indicators and hazard lamps, indicate recurring electrical concerns; confirm that all direction indicators, the hazard switch, and both headlamps function correctly and produce the correct beam pattern, as these items have now failed the vehicle at three separate tests. Finally, given the corrosion history, an inspection on a ramp is strongly advisable before purchase, as surface rust visible on the underside may mask more serious structural deterioration in the mounting areas the DVSA has repeatedly flagged.

ND55 WCC Key Findings

  • 1 MOT test recorded
  • Latest MOT failed on 31/05/2022
  • 92,913 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 1 historical MOT failure
  • 12 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring brakes items (3 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
30
/ 100 · Poor
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Poor

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
✗ Poor MOT pass rate (0%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for ND55WCC

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

ND55 WCC MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 5 Sept 2026, 04:58
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

1 MOT test are recorded for this 2005 Peugeot 107 (ND55 WCC) between May 2022 and May 2022.

The record contains 0 passes and 1 failure.

The most recent test on 31 May 2022 was a fail; the vehicle has not passed its last recorded MOT.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Brakes (3 issues), Suspension (3 issues), Lighting (1 issue), Windscreen (1 issue), Bodywork (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 4 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural streng”; “Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural stren”; “Nearside Inner Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY