2011 KIA RIO 1.4L Petrol · PF60 AAU

The most recent MOT tests on this 2011 Kia Rio, conducted on 26 February 2026 , reveal an unusual but technically compliant history—both tests at 75,258 miles were recorded as passed and failed simultaneously, which suggests either a technical error in the DVSA system or a deliberate double-entry rather than an actual mechanical issue. The preceding tests in February 2025 (65,024 miles) and February 2024 (55,334 miles) also show identical passed/failed dual entries, indicating no genuine defects were detected during any of these inspections. While this lack of recorded faults is reassuring, the repeated anomalies in the database warrant scrutiny to confirm whether the vehicle was genuinely tested or if the data has been manipulated. The mileage progression of approximately 10,000 miles per year —from 55,334 miles in February 2024 to 75,258 miles in February 2026 —suggests moderate usage, though the exact pattern is unclear due to the sparse data. There are no obvious gaps indicating prolonged non-use, nor are there signs of rapid mileage accumulation that might imply aggressive driving. However, the consistency of the mileage increments could also imply the vehicle has been stored intermittently, which may have contributed to minor wear not yet requiring MOT intervention. The low annual mileage for a vehicle of this age typically correlates with less stress on suspension components, but it also raises questions about whether critical fluids (e.g., brake fluid, power steering) have been refreshed according to manufacturer schedules. Given the absence of recorded defects, a prospective buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of suspension bushes and coil springs , particularly at the rear where binding or uneven wear is common in vehicles of this age. The lack of advisories in the MOT history does not preclude corrosion—check for rust penetration in wheel arches, sills, and sub-frame areas, as this can compromise structural integrity. Brake discs and calipers should be examined for uneven wear or binding, especially if the vehicle has been stored, as moisture can accelerate corrosion. Tyre tread depth, while not flagged in the MOT, should be verified, as the dual entries at 65,024 miles and 75,258 miles suggest the tester may have overlooked minor tread limits. Finally, verify the accuracy of the MOT database entries, as the repeated passed/failed anomalies could indicate either a system glitch or deliberate concealment of issues.