2010 Renault Scenic 1.5L Diesel · PY10 AXP

The 2010 Renault Scenic’s most recent MOT tests, conducted on 12 August 2025 at 121,125 miles, reveal a concerning pattern of repeated failures despite identical mileage readings. The vehicle passed one test and failed the next on the same day, with no defects recorded—this suggests either a technical error in the testing process or a deliberate attempt to bypass inspection, though neither scenario bodes well for transparency. The previous cycle, in August 2024 at 115,123 miles, mirrored this inconsistency, with another pass and fail recorded on the same date. The August 2023 test at 112,670 miles was the only clean pass in this period, indicating the vehicle has not undergone consistent or reliable roadworthiness checks. The lack of advisories or defects in any test implies no immediate catastrophic failures, but the repeated failures raise serious questions about the vehicle’s maintenance history and whether critical components have been overlooked. The recorded mileage progression of approximately 7,570 miles per year aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, though the abrupt jumps between tests—particularly the 6,500-mile gap between August 2023 and August 2024—suggest periods where the car may have been driven heavily or stood unused. The identical mileage readings for the 2024 and 2025 tests at the same dates are highly unusual and warrant further investigation, as they imply either tampering with the odometer or an error in mileage reporting. Without additional service records, it is impossible to confirm whether major components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake calipers have been replaced or if corrosion has been addressed, as these are common failure points at this mileage. Given the repeated MOT failures and the lack of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear axle and bushes, as binding or worn components often go unnoticed until they fail. The brakes, including calipers and discs, should be scrutinised for uneven wear or corrosion, as these are frequently overlooked in vehicles with inconsistent maintenance. Structural integrity, especially around the wheel arches and sills, must be examined for signs of rust penetration, which can compromise the chassis. The engine bay should also be checked for fluid leaks, as these often indicate neglected servicing. The repeated failures suggest a pattern of either deferred maintenance or deliberate avoidance of proper checks, so thorough documentation of any past repairs or service history will be essential.