2016 Ford Tourneo 2.0L Diesel · RF07 AAA

The 2016 Ford Tourneo presents a stable roadworthiness record over its recent MOT history, with the most critical observation being the August 2025 retest—just three days after an initial failure—where no defects were recorded at 70,055 miles. This suggests the vehicle passed a full inspection without major issues, though the failure itself is unexplained in the provided data, which is unusual given the DVSA’s requirement to document reasons for failure. The subsequent clean pass at identical mileage (70,555 miles) in August 2025 indicates no recurring defects have emerged in the past nine months, a positive sign for structural and mechanical integrity. The absence of advisories or defects across all five tests since 2022 implies consistent upkeep, though the initial 2025 failure raises a minor red flag worth probing further. Mileage accumulation aligns closely with typical expectations for a vehicle of this age, averaging around 7,056 miles annually—a figure that suggests moderate but not excessive use. The gap between the 2024 test (60,527 miles) and the 2025 retest (70,555 miles) covers roughly 10,000 miles in under a year, a pace that would stress components like brakes, suspension bushes, and tyre wear if maintenance was neglected. However, the clean MOT history during this period contradicts that concern. The most notable pattern is the three-year interval between tests in 2022 and 2024, where mileage jumped from 45,054 to 60,527—a 15,473-mile increase over 18 months. While not alarming, this suggests either a period of heavier use or delayed testing, which could mask deferred servicing. For a buyer, the lack of defects in the MOT history simplifies due diligence, but key areas still warrant close inspection. Focus on the suspension—particularly the coil springs, anti-roll bars, and bushings—given the vehicle’s age and mileage, as these often degrade without MOT visibility. The brakes should be tested dynamically; while no binding or corrosion was noted, the 2025 failure could hint at a near-miss issue, such as uneven disc wear or seized calipers. Structural integrity is less of a concern with no advisories for corrosion or frame damage, but a thorough check for surface rust in wheel arches, sills, and underbody is prudent. Tyre condition and tread depth should be verified, as the MOT does not always catch uneven wear or embedded damage. Finally, the exhaust system and emissions—though not flagged—should be assessed for leaks or excessive backpressure, as these can develop silently between tests.