2015 Peugeot 2008 1.6L Diesel · RO64 LNR

The most recent MOT test on May 26, 2026, confirms the vehicle remains roadworthy with no defects recorded at 88,805 miles. However, the history reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures and advisories, particularly around lighting and tyre conditions. The June 2025 test was initially failed for incorrect headlamp aim and a nearside tyre worn close to the legal limit, though it later passed after rectification. This suggests a lack of proactive maintenance, as these issues should have been addressed before the test date. The 2024 test noted a minor headlamp issue with a product on the light source, while the 2023 and 2025 (passed) tests showed no defects. The trend indicates intermittent neglect rather than consistent upkeep, with critical components like lighting and tyres repeatedly requiring attention. The mileage progression suggests typical usage for a vehicle of this age, averaging around 8,073 miles annually. There are no extreme gaps or rapid accumulations—from 69,876 miles in June 2023 to 88,805 miles today, the vehicle has covered roughly 18,929 miles in just over three years, which aligns with moderate usage. However, the absence of a test between June 2025 and May 2026—despite the vehicle being due—raises suspicion about whether other maintenance was deferred. The most notable outlier is the failed test in June 2025, where the same mileage (85,081) appears twice, implying either an error in the record or a delay in rectifying faults before retesting. Given this history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension components, particularly the rear brakes and bushes, as binding brakes were not explicitly flagged but are common in vehicles with deferred maintenance. The repeated tyre failures suggest worn suspension bushes or misaligned wheels, so the alignment and condition of the coil springs and steering geometry should be checked. Corrosion around the wheel arches and sills is also worth examining, as the vehicle’s age increases the risk of structural weakening. Finally, the headlamp aim failures indicate potential misalignment or worn suspension components affecting the steering geometry—verify the mounting points and adjustability of the headlamp units.