2019 Citroen C3 1.2L Petrol · SA19 ABC

The most recent MOT tests for this 2019 Citroën C3, conducted on identical dates in May 2025, reveal a concerning pattern of repeated failures despite identical mileage—41,689 miles—at both attempts. The absence of recorded defects in either test suggests the failures were procedural rather than mechanical, though this raises questions about the tester’s consistency or potential oversight of underlying issues. The previous MOT history, spanning from June 2023 to June 2024, shows a similar pattern of two tests at the same mileage (31,934 miles) with no defects, though the June 2023 test passed without issue. This inconsistency in the 2024–2025 cycle warrants further scrutiny, particularly if the vehicle was not moved between tests, as this could imply administrative errors rather than genuine roadworthiness concerns. However, the lack of advisories or recurring mechanical faults in the record suggests no overt signs of neglect in critical systems like suspension, brakes, or structural integrity during these tests. The recorded mileage of 41,689 miles over approximately seven years—roughly 5,956 miles annually—indicates unusually light usage for a vehicle of this age. While this could reflect careful ownership or extended periods of non-use, it also raises the possibility of the odometer being tampered with, particularly given the repeated MOT failures at identical mileage readings. The gap between tests—around 12 months—aligns with the legal requirement, but the lack of intermediate mileage data makes it impossible to verify whether the vehicle was driven at all between tests. If the mileage is genuine, the low annual mileage may mean some components, such as suspension bushes or brake pads, have experienced less wear than average, though this does not guarantee they are in optimal condition. Given the repeated MOT failures at the same mileage and the lack of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the vehicle’s brake system, suspension alignment, and structural integrity. The repeated failures suggest either procedural inconsistencies or potential undocumented issues, such as binding calipers, uneven tyre wear, or worn suspension components that were not flagged during testing. Particular attention should be given to the condition of the rear brakes, which are often overlooked in lighter-used vehicles, and the integrity of the exhaust system, as corrosion or leaks can go unnoticed without a thorough examination. Additionally, the absence of advisories in the MOT history does not preclude hidden issues, so a detailed check of the underbody for corrosion—especially around wheel arches and the sills—and the condition of the coil springs and bushes is essential. Given the low mileage, consumables like brake pads and discs may still be serviceable, but their wear should be confirmed in person.