2009 Ford Transit 2.4L Diesel · ST59 FSY

The most recent MOT test on the 2009 Ford Transit, conducted on 2026-08-25, resulted in a passing outcome, though it did not eliminate the vehicle’s history of persistent, though generally non-dangerous, advisories and minor failures. The trend over the past year shows a return to stability after the failed MOT in August 2026, which highlighted critical issues such as structural corrosion near the front B-pillar and dangerous tyre wear. However, the vehicle’s recurring advisories—particularly concerning suspension components, brake discs, and corrosion—suggest ongoing wear that demands vigilant monitoring. While the latest test did not flag any major defects, the consistent presence of advisories on suspension arm bushings, anti-roll bar wear, and brake disc condition indicates that the vehicle has not been fully serviced or maintained at intervals recommended for its mileage and age. This pattern raises concerns about long-term reliability, especially if the vehicle has been driven at a moderate but sustained pace, as the 102,677-mile figure suggests. The recorded mileage of 102,677 miles for a vehicle aged 17 years represents an annual usage rate of approximately 6,040 miles, which is within the expected range for a Transit of this era, particularly if the car has been used for light commercial or family transport rather than high-mileage driving. However, the absence of a service history or evidence of regular maintenance intervals—such as oil changes or suspension checks—could imply either infrequent servicing or prolonged periods of inactivity, which accelerates wear in consumables and structural components. The rapid progression of corrosion advisories, particularly around the sills and suspension mountings, may also reflect exposure to harsh environmental conditions, such as salted roads in winter or prolonged storage in damp conditions. For a vehicle of this age, the combination of moderate mileage and persistent advisory issues suggests that the wear is more likely driven by calendar-based aging rather than excessive driving. Given the vehicle’s MOT history, the prospective buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the suspension system, focusing on the front and rear suspension arms, anti-roll bars, and coil springs. During a test drive, listen for unusual clunking noises from the suspension, particularly when transitioning between bumps and potholes, which could indicate worn or broken suspension components. Check for uneven tyre wear patterns, which may suggest misalignment or suspension issues, and verify that the brake discs—especially those with recorded advisories—do not exhibit excessive pitting or scoring. Inspect the exhaust system for leaks, as minor leaks can lead to emissions issues and increased engine stress, and ensure the vehicle does not pull to one side, which could signal alignment or suspension imbalance. Additionally, the presence of corrosion advisories around the sills and structural mountings warrants a visual inspection for rust progression, particularly in areas prone to moisture exposure, and a check for any structural integrity concerns that could compromise the vehicle’s safety. For practical checks beyond the MOT advisories, the buyer should examine the tyres for sidewall cracking or perishing, which is more common in older vehicles due to the degradation of natural rubber compounds over time. Test the 12-volt battery for adequate charge and ensure all electrical components, including the registration plate lamp, are functioning correctly. Given the vehicle’s age and the lack of a service history, it is advisable to verify the last oil change date and ensure the engine oil and coolant are within their recommended service intervals, as these fluids degrade over time regardless of mileage. Finally, the buyer should confirm that the vehicle’s service book or maintenance records are up to date, particularly for suspension and brake components, which have shown recurring advisories. If no service history is available, a comprehensive mechanical inspection by a qualified technician is strongly recommended to address the outstanding advisories and prevent potential failure points from escalating into costly repairs.