IsItAGoodCar
Official DVLA Record

2002 Audi TT 1.8L Petrol · TT52 LJT

TT52 LJT

2002 Audi TT (1.8L, petrol). First registered 31 Oct 2002. Recorded mileage 141,043 miles. MOT expired on 22 Nov 2022.

Make & Model
AUDI TT
Year / Origin
2002
Safety Recall
Unknown
MOT Status
Expired on 22 Nov 2022
Road Tax
—
Recorded Mileage
141,043 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 1.8L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Expired
Expired on 22 Nov 2022
Tax Status
Check Tax
Click to check rates
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2002
Engine
1781cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

A pattern of fractured coil springs, corroded brake pipes, and recurring minor advisories defines the roadworthiness profile of this 24-year-old Audi, with the most recent pass on 23 November 2021 carrying forward concerns that warrant careful inspection. Across eight recorded tests spanning 2014 to 2021, the vehicle has accumulated one outright failure in 2019 centred on three fractured coil springs and headlamp aim defects, plus a near-miss the day before its 2021 pass when an offside front position lamp failure and headlamp lens defects were recorded. Beyond these, the advisory record is dense and telling: oil leaks have been flagged on three separate occasions, brake pipe corrosion has appeared at multiple locations along the front-to-rear and flexible hose junctions, the offside rear wheel bearing showed slight play in 2021, front suspension arm bushes were noted as deteriorated in 2014, and rear brake pads were flagged as wearing thin in 2020. The mechanical narrative is therefore not one of steady decline but rather one of chronic, systemic wear affecting the suspension, braking, and lubrication systems simultaneously. The recorded mileage of 141,043 miles against the vehicle's age equates to roughly 5,877 miles per year on average, which is notably low for a car of this vintage and could reflect either genuinely light usage or extended periods off the road. There is a clear testing gap between January 2017 and April 2019 of over two years with no recorded MOT, which combined with the low annual mileage raises the possibility of significant standing time. Standing periods are mechanically significant on an Audi TT of this era: rubber components such as suspension bushes, coil springs, brake hoses, and driveshaft gaiters deteriorate faster through age than through mileage, and corrosion on underbody steel items including brake pipes, subframes, and exhaust hangers progresses regardless of how few miles are covered. The fact that advisories and failures for spring fractures and brake pipe corrosion have appeared despite the low annual mileage strongly suggests age-related deterioration rather than wear-from-use. For a prospective buyer, the underbody and suspension should be the primary focus of any physical inspection. The three fractured coil springs recorded in 2019 indicate that replacement units have been fitted, and these should be examined for signs of seat corrosion where the spring locates into the strut turret, as this is a known weak point on the TT platform. On a test drive, listen for clonking or knocking noises from the front and rear suspension over speed humps and uneven surfaces, which would suggest perished bushes, worn top mounts, or loose anti-roll bar linkages. Pay particular attention to steering precision: any vagueness, knocking through the wheel, or uneven tyre wear on the inner or outer edges would point to the deteriorated front suspension arm bushes flagged in 2014 potentially having progressed to excessive movement. The brake system requires equal scrutiny given the recurring corrosion advisories along the brake pipes running front to rear and at the flexible hose junctions. On inspection, these pipes should be examined for surface rust and any pitting that penetrates the pipe wall, particularly along the chassis rails and under the fuel tank area where road salt and moisture collect. The pedal should feel firm and progressive underfoot, with no sponginess or excessive travel, and the vehicle should pull up in a straight line without any pulling to one side, which would indicate a binding caliper or uneven pad wear. The offside rear wheel bearing flagged with slight play in 2021 should be assessed by rotating the wheel by hand to feel for roughness or grumbling, and on the road a rising hum that changes with cornering load would confirm wear. Finally, the persistent oil leak advisories warrant a thorough under-bonnet inspection for fresh oil residue around the cam chain tensioner area, turbo oil feed and return pipes if fitted, and the sump gasket, as oil leaks on the 1.8T engine often originate from the cam chain tensioner sealing sleeve and can lead to chain stretch if left unaddressed.

TT52 LJT Key Findings

  • 2 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 23/11/2021
  • 141,043 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 1 historical MOT failure
  • 3 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring tyres items (5 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
25
/ 100 · Poor
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Poor

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (50%)
✗ 2 dangerous defects found recently
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for TT52LJT

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Finance
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Write-off
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Salvage
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Imported
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Exported
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Scrapped
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Destruction
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
V5C Logbook
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

TT52 LJT Mileage History

  1. 22/11/2021141,043 mi
  2. 23/11/2021141,043 mi

Average of roughly 0 miles per year across 2 recorded odometer readings.

TT52 LJT MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 8 Oct 2026, 08:32
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

2 MOT tests are recorded for this 2002 Audi Tt (TT52 LJT) between November 2021 and November 2021.

The record contains 1 pass and 1 failure.

The most recent test on 23 November 2021 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Tyres (5 issues), Lighting (5 issues), Windscreen (2 issues), Steering (1 issue), Suspension (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 7 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))”; “Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))”; “Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY