2014 Ford C-MAX 1.0L Petrol · VA14 ABO

This 2014 Ford C-Max has demonstrated consistent MOT compliance over the past two years, with the most recent test on 2026-02-12 confirming no defects despite a minor anomaly where the vehicle was tested twice within two days—once passing and once failing without recorded issues. The absence of advisories or recurring faults in the last four tests suggests the vehicle has not suffered from persistent mechanical or structural problems. However, the double-testing in February 2026 raises a minor red flag, as it implies either a procedural oversight or a last-minute inspection to clear the vehicle for sale, warranting further scrutiny of its current condition. The mileage progression of 134,344 miles today reflects a steady accumulation of approximately 11,200 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no extended gaps in service or unusually rapid mileage jumps, though the largest interval between tests—between November 2022 (96,964 miles) and February 2024 (112,634 miles)—spans 18 months. This suggests the vehicle was either lightly used or stood unused for a period, which could have mitigated some wear but also allowed for potential corrosion or fluid degradation. The most recent 11,700 miles since the last MOT (February 2026) aligns with average usage, though the double-testing indicates the owner may have prioritised passing the MOT over thorough pre-inspection. Given the lack of advisories in prior tests, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear components such as the suspension bushes and coil springs, particularly around the wheel arches where corrosion often develops in this model. The brakes, including calipers and discs, should be checked for uneven wear or binding, as the absence of failures does not guarantee they have been maintained—especially given the vehicle’s age. Tyre tread depth and lateral wear patterns should also be examined closely, as the MOT history does not reveal any failures in this area, but failing twice on tread in a single test cycle would typically indicate neglect. Finally, a thorough examination of the underbody for structural rust, particularly around the sills and subframe, is essential, as this is a common failure point in older Ford models. The double-testing in February 2026 warrants additional scrutiny of the vehicle’s current mechanical state beyond the MOT’s scope.