2016 Renault Master 2.3L Diesel · WA66 AYE

The 2016 Renault Master has maintained a consistent MOT pass history across five consecutive tests, with no defects or advisories recorded in any of the most recent examinations. The most recent MOT, conducted on 2025-10-09 at 134,647 miles, confirms the vehicle remains roadworthy under current DVSA standards. This pattern suggests no recurring mechanical failures or structural issues have been formally identified during official testing, though it does not preclude hidden wear or deferred maintenance between tests. The recorded mileage of 134,647 miles over a decade—approximately 13,465 miles annually—indicates relatively high usage for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps in the MOT history, with tests conducted annually without fail, which implies either disciplined servicing or consistent vehicle operation. The most rapid mileage accumulation appears between the 2021 (73,589 miles) and 2022 (92,613 miles) tests, a jump of 19,024 miles in a year, though this does not necessarily signal neglect. Such mileage demands closer scrutiny of high-wear components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers. Given the absence of advisories or defects in the MOT record, the most critical areas for a buyer to inspect independently are the suspension system, particularly for worn or leaking bushes and degraded coil springs, which are common failure points at this mileage. The braking system should be thoroughly checked for uneven wear on discs or pads, binding calipers, and corrosion on brake lines, as these issues often develop incrementally without immediate MOT failure. Structural integrity, especially around wheel arches and sills, warrants inspection for corrosion or damage, particularly if the vehicle has operated in wet or salted environments. The exhaust system should also be examined for leaks or excessive rust, as emissions-related faults are not always captured in basic MOT tests. Finally, the condition of the tyres—tread depth, sidewall integrity, and uniformity—should be verified, as the lack of advisories in prior tests does not guarantee they have been consistently replaced or rotated.