2020 Nissan NV400 Tekna DCI 2.3L Diesel · WG70 LMM

Commercial vehicle duties have left a distinct trail of consumable wear across this six-year-old Nissan NV400, culminating in an April 2026 test pass accompanied by a minor defect for a slightly damaged offside mirror. The MOT history reveals a mixed trajectory of roadworthiness, moving from clean passes in its early years through a cluster of multi-item advisories and a windscreen failure before stabilizing at the most recent inspection. Rather than presenting an immaculate mechanical record, the testing archive highlights an operational life where heavy-duty components such as brakes and tyres have required replacement intervals, directly reflecting the demanding nature of utility vehicle usage. Accumulating 58,285 miles over roughly six years results in an average of just under 10,000 miles annually, a standard usage pattern for a large panel van that points towards steady, working deployment rather than prolonged periods of inactivity. This consistent mileage accumulation means that while the drivetrain has avoided the risks associated with long-term lay-ups, the chassis, suspension joints, and braking architecture have experienced regular loads. Prospective buyers should anticipate that a vehicle operating at this mileage threshold will require careful scrutiny of working components that bear the brunt of commercial carriage weight. Specific attention must be paid to the braking system during a physical inspection and test drive, given that previous test logs flagged both front and rear brake discs as worn, pitted, or scored. On a test drive, listen closely for any scraping noises, metal-on-metal friction, or grinding when applying the pedal, and check for any steering wheel judder or vehicle pull under heavy braking that would indicate warped or degraded friction surfaces. Furthermore, the record notes previous front tyre wear close to the legal limit or worn on the edges, meaning wheel alignment geometry should be inspected alongside the remaining tread depth across all corners to ensure even contact patches and prevent premature rubber degradation. The structural and exterior elements also demand a thorough hands-on check, particularly following the major failure recorded for a damaged windscreen affecting the driver's view, which demonstrates that previous glass replacement was necessary. Verify that the current windscreen is free from chips, cracks, or improper sealing that could allow moisture ingress into the cabin. Additionally, inspect the slightly damaged offside mirror housing noted in the latest test to ensure the glass adjustment mechanism and casing security are fully functional, and complete a thorough walkaround of the body panels and underside to confirm that the commercial workload has not induced premature corrosion or structural fatigue on the chassis members.