IsItAGoodCar
Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Road Tax Paid

2006 MINI 1.6L Petrol · WK56 XTJ

WK56 XTJ

2006 MINI (1.6L, petrol). First registered 01/09/2006. Recorded mileage 155,304 miles. MOT valid until 04/03/2027. Taxed until 01/09/2026.

Make & Model
MINI MINI
Year / Origin
2006 · Truro
Safety Recall
Unknown
MOT Status
Valid until 04/03/2027
Road Tax
Taxed (01/09/2026)
Recorded Mileage
155,304 mi
ULEZ Compliance
ULEZ Compliant (Euro 4+)
Fuel & Engine
PETROL · 1.6L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 04/03/2027
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/09/2026
Fuel Type
PETROL
Year
2006
Engine
1598cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The vehicle is currently roadworthy but the history reveals a concerning trend of reactive maintenance. While it passed its most recent test in March 2026 at 155,304 miles, this followed a significant failure just six weeks prior. The presence of multiple critical failures in February 2026, including an inoperative power steering system, failed airbag, and defective parking brake, suggests that the car is only being repaired when necessary to pass the annual test rather than through a proactive service schedule. At 155,304 miles over twenty years, the MINI has averaged approximately 7,765 miles per year, which is consistent with an older vehicle. However, the data shows a sharp increase in usage between February 2024 at 120,006 miles and February 2026 at 155,304 miles. The car covered 35,000 miles in just two years. This rapid accumulation likely accelerated the wear seen on the suspension and braking components, leading to the multiple failures noted in the early 2026 records. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the structural integrity, as the tester flagged corrosion on the rear vehicle structure in two consecutive 2026 tests. Although structural rigidity is not yet compromised, rust is a progressive issue that requires close monitoring. The front suspension arm bushes have also been noted as worn since at least January 2024, indicating a persistent weakness in the front end that will eventually require replacement. Specific attention should also be paid to the braking system and steering. The record shows a failure for low brake fluid and poor parking brake efficiency in early 2026, which were supposedly rectified before the March pass. Given the history of low brake fluid levels and the previous failure of the power steering pump, the buyer should verify that these repairs were permanent and that no fluid leaks are present in the hydraulic lines.

WK56 XTJ Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 05/03/2026
  • 155,304 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 2 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring suspension items (6 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
65
/ 100 · Average
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Average

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for WK56XTJ

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

ULEZ Compliant

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

WK56 XTJ Mileage History

  1. 01/02/2024120,006 mi
  2. 30/01/2025140,111 mi+20,105 mi
  3. 30/01/2025140,111 mi
  4. 20/02/2026155,304 mi+15,193 mi
  5. 05/03/2026155,304 mi

Average of roughly 16,903 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

WK56 XTJ MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 16 Jun 2026, 04:00
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2006 Mini Mini (WK56 XTJ) between February 2024 and March 2026.

The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 05 March 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Suspension (6 issues), Brakes (2 issues), Tyres (2 issues), Steering (1 issue), Windscreen (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 10 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Driver's door cannot be opened from outside the vehicle (6.2.3 (a))”; “Driver's airbag obviously inoperative (7.1.5 (c))”; “Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both (4.1.2 (c))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY