2017 Toyota C-HR 1.8L Hybrid electric (clean) · WM17 AAE

The 2017 Toyota C-HR most recently passed its MOT on 14 May 2026, with only a minor windscreen damage note carried forward from the previous year. This is a positive indicator in itself, and the overall trend across the recorded tests suggests a broadly stable maintenance profile. The vehicle has passed its annual test on every occasion where the result was not blocked by a major failure item, and the 2024 entry demonstrates a quick turnaround from a PRS-adjacent tyre failure to a clean pass within a day. However, the 2025 test reveals a small cluster of suspension and lighting advisories that have since been left unattended at the time of the 2026 test, and the persistent windscreen damage is a minor but ongoing concern that could escalate if further impact or thermal stress occurs. With 107,479 miles recorded over approximately nine years, the C-HR is averaging around 11,942 miles annually, which sits comfortably within the typical range for a privately used vehicle of this age. There are no obvious extended gaps in the MOT history to suggest long periods of standing, nor is there evidence of exceptionally high annual accumulation that would indicate motorway or commercial-style use. This kind of steady, moderate mileage generally bodes well for mechanical longevity, particularly in terms of engine internals, clutch wear (if applicable), and driveline condition, though consumable items such as brakes, tyres, and suspension components will inevitably have required attention over such a distance. A prospective buyer should still verify that the mileage is continuous and consistent with the service book, and confirm the timing belt or chain service interval has been observed depending on the powertrain fitted. Looking at the recurring items, the most significant advisory is from May 2025 noting that the offside rear outer brake pads are wearing thin, and given typical usage this should have been addressed by now. A test drive should focus on braking performance, listening for any grinding or squealing from the rear, and checking for pulling to one side under firm application. More pressing are the two minor advisories from the same test regarding the nearside and offside suspension arm ball joint dust covers being severely deteriorated and losing grease. These rubber boots protect the ball joint internals from contamination, and once they split, moisture and dirt ingress accelerate wear of the joint itself. On a test drive, listen for clunks or knocking from the front suspension over speed humps, uneven tarmac, or during full-lock manoeuvres, and visually inspect the boots for splits, grease contamination on surrounding components, or any play when the wheel is rocked by hand. These joints are not particularly expensive on their own but should be rectified before they compromise steering precision or fail an MOT. Beyond the recorded advisories, the vehicle is now nine years old and approaching the point where age-related deterioration becomes more relevant than mileage-related wear. Inspect the tyres carefully for sidewall cracking or perishing, which is common on vehicles that have seen prolonged UV exposure regardless of tread depth, and verify that all four tyres are of matching brand, size, and speed rating. Check the 12V battery, as units of this age are often operating on borrowed time, particularly if the vehicle has had any periods of infrequent use. Examine the brake discs for corrosion ridges on the outer edges, which can cause pedal pulsation or juddering under hard braking, and listen for any binding from the calipers after a short drive. Finally, confirm the timing chain or belt service interval has been observed, request evidence of recent brake fluid and coolant changes (both of which degrade with calendar age rather than mileage), and ensure the Toyota service book is present with corroborating invoices to validate the consistent MOT pass record.