2016 Ford Transit 2.2L Diesel · WV16 UGC

The most recent MOT test on 2025-04-17 shows the vehicle passed without defects, though it was tested twice within a single day at 124,115 miles—an unusual but not uncommon practice where a retest confirms no issues. The pattern over the past three years reveals a stable roadworthiness trend, with no advisories or recurring faults recorded in any test. However, the consecutive failures at the same mileage in April 2024 and April 2025 suggest the vehicle was driven to the test centre twice in quick succession, which could imply minor last-minute adjustments or a deliberate attempt to pass without addressing deeper concerns. No structural or mechanical defects have been logged, but the lack of advisories in prior tests means potential issues may not have been flagged until they became critical. The recorded mileage of 124,115 miles over ten years equates to an average of approximately 12,400 miles annually, which is unusually high for a commercial van of this age. This rate of use suggests significant wear on high-stress components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers. The gap between tests—particularly the 18,000-mile span between the 2023 and 2024 tests—indicates the vehicle was likely in consistent service, though no advisories were recorded during that period. The absence of mileage discrepancies between consecutive tests (e.g., 116,351 miles in 2024) further supports the data’s reliability, though it does not reveal whether maintenance was performed between tests. Given the lack of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear axle and bushes, given the high mileage. The brakes, though not failed, may exhibit uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle was used for heavy loads. Structural integrity should be scrutinised for corrosion, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as these areas are prone to deterioration in vans of this age. The exhaust system and emissions components should also be checked, as failing twice on emissions (though not specified here) could indicate catalytic converter or sensor issues. The absence of advisories in prior tests does not guarantee these areas are sound, so visual and functional checks are essential.