2016 Ford Ranger 3.2L Diesel · Y4 COL
2016 Ford Ranger (3.2L, diesel). First registered 01/08/2016. Recorded mileage 46,042 miles. MOT valid until 08/08/2027. Taxed until 01/07/2027.
- Make & Model
- FORD RANGER
- Year / Origin
- 2016 · Leeds
- MOT Status
- Valid until 08/08/2027
- Road Tax
- Taxed (01/07/2027)
- Recorded Mileage
- 46,042 mi
- ULEZ Compliance
- ULEZ Compliant (Euro 6 Diesel)
- Fuel & Engine
- DIESEL · 3.2L
- Reliability Guide
- Common Faults
- Fuel Type
- DIESEL
- Year
- 2016
- Engine
- 3198cc
Y4 COL Key Findings
- 5 MOT tests recorded
- Latest MOT passed on 28/07/2026
- 46,042 miles recorded at latest MOT
- 1 historical MOT failure
- No defects recorded at the latest MOT
- Recurring tyres items (7 mentions)
Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.
MOT Roadworthiness: Good
This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.
Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.
Digital Service History
Access verified franchised dealer maintenance records for Y4COL.
Unlock Manufacturer Digital Service Records
Check franchised dealer maintenance history for Y4COL. Our direct integration verifies routine service events, workshop operations, recorded mileage, and technician logs.
Technical Specifications
Core Specifications
Identification & Status
Dimensions & Weights
Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence
Estimate current market value
Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.
Y4 COL Mileage History
- 24/07/202335,501 mi
- 15/07/202439,994 mi+4,493 mi
- 16/07/202439,994 mi
- 12/07/202543,387 mi+3,393 mi
- 28/07/202646,042 mi+2,655 mi
Average of roughly 3,500 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.
Y4 COL MOT History
Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.
5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2016 Ford Ranger (Y4 COL) between July 2023 and July 2026.
The record contains 4 passes and 1 failure.
The most recent test on 28 July 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.
Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Tyres (7 issues), Brakes (2 issues). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.
In total 8 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.
Recorded failure items include: “Nearside Front Inner Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii))”.
Buyer's Guide & Inspection Advisory
Expert automotive synthesis from historical MOT defect records and market benchmarks.
Our Verdict
Proceed with caution and a thorough mech
The MOT history shows this 3.2-litre TDCi Ranger has had a clean bill of health at three of its four tests, which is a reasonable starting point for a working vehicle of this age. However, the July 2024 failure on front brake pads and discs is a known service item on the Ranger, particularly the heavy-duty 3.2 diesel variant, so it should not be alarming in isolation, but it should be verified that the work was carried out to a high standard with quality components. The repeated front-tyre wear advisories across consecutive tests (2023, 2024 and 2025) point to either an unresolved tracking or suspension geometry issue, or simply a vehicle being used for heavy-load work. Either way, a four-wheel alignment check and an inspection of the front suspension arms, bushes and ball joints would be sensible.
Because the odometer reads significantly below the Ranger model average, it is worth questioning how the vehicle has been used. Low-mileage examples that have towed heavy loads or spent time off-road can still suffer wear on clutches, transfer boxes, prop shafts and differentials that a road-going car of the same mileage would avoid. Ask to see evidence of the gearbox, transfer box and rear differential oil changes, and check the underbody for evidence of off-road use, corrosion around the chassis and inner wing condition given the diesel's exposure to mud and grime.
When negotiating, factor in the cost of at least two new front tyres, a geometry check and a fresh set of front brake pads as a near-certainty. The 3.2 TDCi engine itself is generally considered robust, but the DPF system on any 2016 diesel should be checked for warning lights and the condition of the timing chain and dual-mass flywheel examined, particularly if the vehicle has been used for towing.
Fuel economy for the 3.2-litre TDCi Ranger typically sits in the 28-32 mpg real-world range, dropping towards low-20s when towing. With diesel prices in the UK, expect fuel costs of roughly £2,400-£2,800 per year if covering 10,000 miles, though this vehicle's lower-than-average mileage will keep fuel expenditure down. Insurance for a 2016 Ranger 3.2 sits in groups around 40-42, so premiums of £500-£800 annually are typical depending on driver history.
Road tax for a 2016 Ranger with the 3.2 TDCi engine was set under the older pre-2017 system and carries a higher rate than post-2017 equivalents, generally around £275 per year. This is a meaningful cost that buyers of older commercial-style pick-ups sometimes overlook. Maintenance costs for this generation of Ranger are moderate, but parts such as clutch, DMF and turbo components are pricier than the smaller 2.2 TDCi unit.
Estimated annual running costs for this vehicle, assuming average mileage, are in the region of £1,800-£2,200 covering fuel, tax, insurance, routine servicing and an allowance for consumables such as tyres and brake pads. The recurring front-tyre advisories in the MOT record suggest tyres may need replacing more frequently than once every two years on this particular example.
Begin with a close look at the front braking system. The July 2024 failure recorded worn front inner brake discs and sub-1.5mm brake pads, both of which are safety-critical items. Confirm the discs were replaced rather than skimmed, and check the current pad and disc thickness directly. The fact that the same vehicle passed the very next day at the same mileage strongly suggests a rushed repair, so it is worth checking that the work was done professionally and that receipts or invoices exist.
Front-tyre wear appears in the MOT record at three consecutive tests. This is significant and could indicate an unresolved tracking issue, worn suspension components, or simply the use of budget tyres. Inspect the inner edges of both front tyres for feathered wear, check the camber and castor angles, and examine the front upper and lower wishbones, drop links and anti-roll bar bushes. On the 3.2 TDCi, the front suspension is particularly hard worked due to the engine's weight over the front axle.
Finally, for a diesel Ranger of this vintage, carry out the standard checks: look for DPF warning lights or stored fault codes, listen for timing chain rattle on cold start, check for oil leaks from the front crankshaft seal, and inspect the EGR valve and intercooler piping for carbon build-up. The 3.2 engine is fitted with a relatively complex emissions system, and any neglect here can lead to bills running into four figures.
This 2016 Ford Ranger with the 3.2-litre TDCi diesel engine has covered 46,042 miles across four recorded MOT tests, passing three and failing one. The single failure in July 2024 centred on nearside front brake components and inner front tyres, all of which were addressed ahead of the pass the following day. The mileage equates to roughly 4,585 miles per year, well below the Ranger model average of 9,754 annual miles. Overall the record is respectable but the recurring front-tyre advisory pattern across 2023, 2024 and 2025 suggests a persistent wear issue worth investigating.
Across 153,922 Ford Rangers analysed, the average MOT pass rate is 79.9%, with the most common failure reasons being headlamp issues, coil spring wear and tyre-related defects. This vehicle's record sits broadly in line with that aggregate, though the brake-related failure is not among the top model-level failure categories.
Reviewed by the IsItAGoodCar editorial team — Verified automotive analysis synthesized from official vehicle registries.
Data Sources
DVSA
Official MOT test logs & failure reasons
DVLA
Tax, registration & powertrain specs
Experian
Finance, stolen markers & total loss
AI Analysis
Historical fault & advisory patterns
Similar Vehicles
Similar Vehicles Checked Recently
Plate Neighbors
Batch Registration Neighbors (Y4CO Series)
Vehicles registered in the same regional DVLA batch as Y4COL.
KIA
SPORTAGE 3 CRDI ISG MHEV S-A
BMW
X5
MERCEDES-BENZ
C
PORSCHE
TAYCAN GTS
INEOS
GRENADIER FIELDMASTER ED AUTO
MERCEDES-BENZ
E
BMW
116
KAWASAKI
ER 650 MNFBB
NISSAN
QASHQAI N-CONNECTA E-POWER A
VAUXHALL
ADAM