2017 SEAT Ibiza 1.2L Petrol · YA66 XEF

The 2017 SEAT Ibiza’s most recent MOT test on 2025-05-02 confirms it passed without defects, though it was retested the day prior after an initial failure at the same mileage. This pattern of consecutive tests at identical mileages suggests either a last-minute pre-sale preparation or a genuine oversight in scheduling. The absence of recorded defects across all five tests—spanning 2023 to 2025—indicates no persistent mechanical issues were detected by the tester, but the repeated retesting at 65,816 miles raises caution. Without advisory notes or faults, the vehicle’s structural integrity and major systems appear to have passed routine checks, though this does not preclude hidden wear or deferred maintenance. The recorded mileage of 65,816 miles over nine years aligns with typical usage for its age, averaging around 7,300 miles annually. There are no significant gaps or abrupt spikes in mileage between tests, which suggests consistent driving habits rather than periods of neglect or excessive wear. The most notable pattern is the identical mileage at both the 2024 and 2025 tests, implying the vehicle may have been stationary or lightly used between those dates. This could indicate either low mileage accumulation or a deliberate delay in scheduling the MOT, though neither directly impacts roadworthiness beyond what has already been tested. Given the lack of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear components that often fail without warning. The repeated retests at the same mileage warrant scrutiny of brake systems, particularly rear calipers or pads, which are common causes of sudden MOT failures. Suspension bushes and coil springs should be checked for excessive play or corrosion, as these degrade gradually and may not have been flagged in previous tests. Additionally, the absence of advisory notes means there’s no prior indication of issues with exhaust emissions, steering components, or structural rust, but these should still be visually inspected for signs of deterioration. Tyre tread depth and condition, while not recorded as faults, should be verified, as failing twice on this criterion would suggest basic upkeep was inconsistent.