2012 Peugeot 5008 1.6L Diesel · YC62 ADV

The 2012 Peugeot 5008’s most recent MOT test on 2025-10-21 confirms it passed without defects, though it was retested just six days earlier after failing on 2025-10-15—an unusual but not uncommon scenario where a minor oversight was corrected before the full retest. The absence of any advisories or recurring faults across all five MOTs suggests the vehicle has not suffered from persistent mechanical issues, but the retest indicates a potential administrative or minor technical hitch that required attention. There is no evidence of worsening structural or safety-critical failures, though the lack of advisories in prior tests means some wear may have gone unnoticed until it reached the MOT threshold. Mileage progression shows a steady accumulation of approximately 6,900 miles annually, which aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age. The gap between tests is consistent at around 12 months, with no prolonged periods of inactivity or rapid mileage spikes. The 1,308 miles covered between the 2024 and 2025 tests (95,332 to 96,642) is within expected variation, though the retest in October 2025 suggests either a last-minute pre-MOT service or an oversight in pre-test preparation. There is no indication of aggressive driving or neglect, but the lack of service records means some maintenance may have been deferred. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of suspension components—particularly the rear bushes and coil springs—given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The retest in October 2025, while passing, raises caution about potential brake or steering system inconsistencies that might have been overlooked. Exhaust emissions should also be verified, as older diesel vehicles can develop leaks or catalytic converter issues without immediate MOT failure. Finally, a thorough check for corrosion, especially around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, is essential, as structural integrity is not always flagged until it becomes a safety risk. Tyre condition, despite no MOT failures, warrants scrutiny, as failing twice on tread depth in prior tests would suggest basic upkeep may have been inconsistent.