2021 Nissan Juke Tekna + DIG-T 1.0L Petrol · YT71 GOC

The 2021 Nissan Juke Tekna + DIG-T presents a clean and stable maintenance trend, with its most recent MOT on 19 September 2025 passing with zero defects recorded at 28,485 miles. The preceding test on 12 September 2024 also passed without advisories or failures at 16,196 miles. Two consecutive clean certificates indicate no recurring mechanical or structural faults have been flagged, and the trend is firmly stable with no evidence of deterioration. The mileage accumulation tells a clear story of very light use. Between the September 2024 and September 2025 tests, the vehicle covered 12,289 miles in twelve months, a notable jump compared to the 16,196 miles it had covered in its first three years. This suggests a change in ownership or usage pattern, with the second year of recorded testing showing significantly higher annual mileage than the vehicle's overall average of roughly 5,697 miles per year. The gap between the two tests is the only available data point for assessing wear rate, but the clean pass outcomes confirm the vehicle remained roadworthy throughout this heavier usage period. Despite the clean MOT record, a buyer should still conduct a thorough in-person inspection focused on areas the MOT does not continuously monitor. The Juke's DIG-T turbocharged engine and CVT gearbox should be assessed for smooth operation under load, particularly given the sudden increase in mileage that may have accelerated drivetrain wear. Suspension components, including front lower arm bushes and rear beam bushings, deserve close scrutiny as these are common failure points on the Juke platform, even if they have not yet triggered a test failure. Tyre condition and brake disc thickness should be checked, as the jump to over 12,000 miles in a single year implies above-average consumable wear that the clean pass does not rule out between test dates. Structurally, the vehicle is relatively new at five years old, but an underbody inspection for corrosion on subframes, suspension mounting points, and inner wing seams remains prudent, especially if the car has spent periods standing during its low-mileage early life. The absence of any advisories across both tests is encouraging, yet it does not substitute for a physical inspection of panel gaps, paint consistency, and interior wear that could indicate undisclosed damage or neglect. Overall, the record supports a well-maintained vehicle with no flagged defects, but the shift in usage intensity warrants a careful pre-purchase examination.