2018 Peugeot Boxer 2.0L Diesel · YY18 EFV

The most recent MOT test on 27 March 2026 confirms the vehicle passed with no defects recorded, though it was preceded by a failure just four days earlier at identical mileage—an anomaly that suggests either a temporary administrative error or a minor oversight in pre-test preparation. The preceding tests in March 2025 and February 2024 also passed without failings, indicating no consistent pattern of recurring faults. However, the double-testing in March 2026, combined with the high mileage, raises cautious questions about whether the vehicle has been subjected to rigorous pre-inspection servicing or if there are undocumented issues lurking beneath the surface. The recorded mileage of 244,743 miles over eight years equates to an average of approximately 30,600 miles annually, which is unusually high for a vehicle of this age. The gap between the 2024 and 2025 tests—46,842 miles in just over a year—suggests either intensive use or prolonged periods of neglect between services. The absence of any advisories or defects across five tests implies that, at the time of inspection, the vehicle met the minimum DVSA standards, but the sheer mileage demands scrutiny of high-wear components. The lack of a service history complicates this further, as critical intervals for suspension bushes, brake calipers, and drivetrain fluids are not documented. Given the high mileage and the recent double-testing, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear axle and coil springs, which are prone to fatigue at this mileage. The brakes—though not explicitly failed—should be checked for uneven wear, binding calipers, or corrosion on the rear discs, as the vehicle’s age and usage pattern increase the risk of hidden deterioration. Structural integrity, especially around the wheel arches and sills, warrants close examination for corrosion, as does the exhaust system for leaks or cracked pipes. The engine bay should be inspected for oil leaks, worn serpentine belts, and the condition of the air filter, given the lack of service records. The double-testing anomaly also justifies verifying whether the vehicle has undergone recent servicing or if there are unresolved issues the tester may have overlooked.