2010 Peugeot 3008 1.6L Diesel · AD10 ABU

The most recent MOT test on 2025-10-23 confirms the vehicle remains roadworthy, though the preceding failure on 2025-10-21—just two days earlier—raises immediate concern. The absence of recorded defects in either test suggests the failure was likely procedural rather than mechanical, though the repeated pass/fail sequence at the same mileage (88,081 and 97,285 miles) warrants scrutiny. No advisories or recurring faults appear in the official record, but the pattern of consecutive tests at nearly identical mileages indicates either a rushed or irregular servicing cycle. The latest pass, just under nine months ago, means the vehicle has not undergone a full MOT re-test since then, placing it in the high-risk window for undetected wear. The recorded mileage of 97,292 miles over 16 years equates to an average of around 6,081 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps in mileage accumulation, nor does the record suggest prolonged periods of inactivity that could lead to neglected maintenance. The most notable irregularity is the clustering of tests in late 2024 and late 2025, where mileage increments of roughly 9,000 miles between tests suggest either consistent usage or a pattern of delayed servicing. Without service history, it is impossible to confirm whether critical intervals for suspension, drivetrain, or brake components were adhered to. Given the lack of recorded defects, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on components prone to wear at this mileage and age. The repeated test dates at similar mileages imply the vehicle may have been driven hard between services, so thorough checks of suspension bushes, coil springs, and shock absorbers are essential. Binding calipers or uneven brake disc wear could indicate past neglect, particularly if the vehicle has been used aggressively. Structural integrity should also be assessed for corrosion, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as these areas are critical for long-term safety. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are sound, so visual and functional inspection is mandatory.