DVLA verified
MOT valid

2011 MAZDA 31.6L Petrol

DA61 AEV

Vehicle Insight Summary

2011 MAZDA 3 — Petrol, 1598cc. This vehicle has 120,855 miles on record. MOT status: valid. Tax: not taxed. Review the complete history and specs.

MOT
Valid
Expires 10/11/2026
Tax
No data
Powered by Experian Data
£8.99
Check outstanding finance, stolen records, write-off categories & mileage anomalies.
Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI
Fuel
Petrol
Year
2011
Engine
1598cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle’s most recent MOT on 2025-11-11 at 120,855 miles recorded a pass with no defects, but this follows a pattern of repeated failures on the same date and mileage, both passing and failing without recorded issues. This inconsistency suggests potential administrative errors or unrecorded defects, as MOT failures typically require specific faults. The lack of defect details in all tests limits definitive assessment, but the absence of structural or mechanical warnings in the latest test implies no immediate safety risks. However, the recurring failures without explanation raise concerns about the vehicle’s reliability and the accuracy of its maintenance history. The mileage of 120,855 miles at 15 years old aligns with average annual usage of 8,057 miles, though a 157-mile increase between 2024-08-28 and 2024-10-11 indicates minimal usage over two months. This could reflect periods of inactivity, potentially leading to component degradation such as seized suspension bushes or corroded exhaust systems. The vehicle’s age and mileage suggest wear on consumables like tyres and brake pads, but the MOT records lack details on these elements. The sparse data makes it difficult to confirm if maintenance was consistent or neglected, though the frequent testing may indicate attempts to meet regulatory standards rather than genuine upkeep. A buyer should inspect the suspension for worn bushes or coil springs, as these often degrade with age and inactivity. Brake components, including calipers and discs, warrant scrutiny due to potential corrosion or uneven wear, especially if the vehicle was stored. Structural rust, particularly in the underbody or chassis, should be checked, as older cars are prone to this. The absence of defect records in MOTs does not guarantee mechanical soundness, and a physical inspection is critical to identify issues not captured in the test data.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Vehicle Public Record vs. Hidden Financial Risk

55
/ 100 · Below Average
DVSA MOT History: Verified

Public MOT roadworthiness: Below Average.

This score reflects past DVSA test passes and advisory frequency. However, it does not check if the car has £15,000 of unpaid finance, an insurance write-off marker, or a police theft report.

✓ Valid MOT
! Tax Status Unknown
✗ Poor MOT pass rate (40%)
! Older vehicle
Hidden Legal & Financial Status: PENDING

Verify finance, insurance write-offs, stolen markers, and mileage rollback before making an offer.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for DA61AEV

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee

Financial & Legal Risk Records Locked

Free DVLA checks do not cover finance debt, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, or mileage fraud. Unlock the official Experian check before committing to buy.

✓ Instant on screen✓ Official Experian data✓ PDF copy emailed✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 16 May 2026, 02:04
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle’s most recent MOT on 2025-11-11 at 120,855 miles recorded a pass with no defects, but this follows a pattern of repeated failures on the same date and mileage, both passing and failing without recorded issues. This inconsistency suggests potential administrative errors or unrecorded defects, as MOT failures typically require specific faults. The lack of defect details in all tests limits definitive assessment, but the absence of structural or mechanical warnings in the latest test implies no immediate safety risks. However, the recurring failures without explanation raise concerns about the vehicle’s reliability and the accuracy of its maintenance history. The mileage of 120,855 miles at 15 years old aligns with average annual usage of 8,057 miles, though a 157-mile increase between 2024-08-28 and 2024-10-11 indicates minimal usage over two months. This could reflect periods of inactivity, potentially leading to component degradation such as seized suspension bushes or corroded exhaust systems. The vehicle’s age and mileage suggest wear on consumables like tyres and brake pads, but the MOT records lack details on these elements. The sparse data makes it difficult to confirm if maintenance was consistent or neglected, though the frequent testing may indicate attempts to meet regulatory standards rather than genuine upkeep. A buyer should inspect the suspension for worn bushes or coil springs, as these often degrade with age and inactivity. Brake components, including calipers and discs, warrant scrutiny due to potential corrosion or uneven wear, especially if the vehicle was stored. Structural rust, particularly in the underbody or chassis, should be checked, as older cars are prone to this. The absence of defect records in MOTs does not guarantee mechanical soundness, and a physical inspection is critical to identify issues not captured in the test data.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Registered in 2011, this Mazda 3 with plate DA61 AEV has undergone 5 MOT inspections since August 2024.

The vehicle has achieved an overall 40% pass rate, with 2 passes and 3 failures recorded. A lower-than-average pass rate suggests the vehicle may have had periods of deferred maintenance.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY