2017 Nissan Juke 1.6L Petrol · G18 MAX

The vehicle presents a stable roadworthiness profile, though recent MOT results indicate a shift toward neglected consumable maintenance. While the car passed its most recent test on 21 November 2025 at 50,070 miles, the inspector flagged multiple tyre issues, specifically cracking, perishing, and the offside front tyre being worn close to the legal limit. This follows a pattern established in the 18 November 2024 test at 45,172 miles, where all four tyres were noted as being damaged, cracked, or perishing. The transition from a clean record in 2022 and 2023 to recurring tyre defects suggests a recent decline in basic upkeep. The mileage accumulation is notably low for a 2017 vehicle, averaging approximately 5,500 miles per year. The data shows consistent, incremental growth, moving from 23,472 miles in November 2020 to 50,070 miles in November 2025. This low annual usage often correlates with the tyre perishing observed in the recent records, as vehicles that sit idle for extended periods frequently suffer from sidewall cracking and rubber degradation due to age rather than tread wear alone. A prospective buyer should prioritise a physical inspection of the tyre condition and the braking system. The 2020 failure at 23,472 miles highlighted front brake pads being below the 1.5 mm legal limit, and while no brake issues appear in the subsequent four years, the recent trend of ignoring tyre wear suggests that brake pad and disc life should be verified. The record also noted a nearside rear door that would not open from the inside in both 2020 and 2021, so the functionality of all door latches and interior handles requires confirmation. Beyond these items, the lack of structural or suspension-related advisories in the history is a positive indicator. The vehicle has avoided significant issues with corrosion, exhaust emissions, or suspension bushes throughout its documented service life. Focus should remain on the consumables, as the current maintenance trend suggests the owner may be reactive rather than proactive regarding routine replacement items.