DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid

2019 VOLVO XC602.0L HYBRID ELECTRIC

NO02 ABD

Vehicle Insight Summary

2019 VOLVO XC60 — HYBRID ELECTRIC, 1969cc. This vehicle has 49,759 miles on record. MOT status: valid. Tax: paid. Review the complete history and specs.

MOT
Valid
Expires 18/01/2027
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/01/2027
Powered by Experian Data
£8.99
Check outstanding finance, stolen records, write-off categories & mileage anomalies.
Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI
Fuel
HYBRID ELECTRIC
Year
2019
Engine
1969cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the maintenance history reveals a reactive rather than proactive approach to repairs. While the most recent test in January 2026 at 49,759 miles passed, the car failed just three days prior due to a critical nearside front tyre defect and thinning rear brake pads. This indicates that the owner only addresses mechanical faults once they reach the point of legal failure, suggesting a trend of deferred maintenance that could mask underlying issues with other components. The mileage pattern is consistent with a seven-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 7,100 miles per year. Between June 2024 at 41,270 miles and June 2025 at 47,607 miles, the car covered roughly 6,000 miles, showing steady usage. This low annual mileage is generally beneficial for the drivetrain and interior components, yet the recurring failures related to tyres and wipers suggest that the low mileage has not resulted in diligent attention to routine consumable upkeep between the annual MOT intervals. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the braking system and tyre assembly. The record repeatedly flags nearside front tyre issues including sidewall cuts and uneven wear, which may point to tracking alignment problems or worn suspension bushes. Furthermore, the thinning rear brake pads noted in January 2026 necessitate a check of the rear brake discs for scoring or glazing to ensure the calipers have not been unnecessarily stressed. Given the previous failure of the wipers, the condition of the wiper blades and the glass should also be verified to ensure visibility remains adequate.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

82
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
A score of 82 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for NO02ABD

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked
Powered by Experian Data

Premium Vehicle History Data Locked

Unlock the full report to reveal outstanding finance agreements, police stolen markers, insurance write-off categories (Cat A/B/C/D/S/N), mileage anomaly checks, and plate changes.

Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges
Euro EURO 6 AG

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 22 Jun 2026, 15:27
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the maintenance history reveals a reactive rather than proactive approach to repairs. While the most recent test in January 2026 at 49,759 miles passed, the car failed just three days prior due to a critical nearside front tyre defect and thinning rear brake pads. This indicates that the owner only addresses mechanical faults once they reach the point of legal failure, suggesting a trend of deferred maintenance that could mask underlying issues with other components. The mileage pattern is consistent with a seven-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 7,100 miles per year. Between June 2024 at 41,270 miles and June 2025 at 47,607 miles, the car covered roughly 6,000 miles, showing steady usage. This low annual mileage is generally beneficial for the drivetrain and interior components, yet the recurring failures related to tyres and wipers suggest that the low mileage has not resulted in diligent attention to routine consumable upkeep between the annual MOT intervals. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the braking system and tyre assembly. The record repeatedly flags nearside front tyre issues including sidewall cuts and uneven wear, which may point to tracking alignment problems or worn suspension bushes. Furthermore, the thinning rear brake pads noted in January 2026 necessitate a check of the rear brake discs for scoring or glazing to ensure the calipers have not been unnecessarily stressed. Given the previous failure of the wipers, the condition of the wiper blades and the glass should also be verified to ensure visibility remains adequate.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Volvo Xc60 (NO02 ABD) from 2019 show a total of 5 MOT tests between June 2024 and January 2026.

With 3 passes and 2 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 60%. While not perfect, the history shows a relatively typical pattern of MOT passes and fails.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Tyres (3 issues), Brakes (2 issues), Windscreen (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 4 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 2 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))”; “Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively X 2 (3.4 (b) (ii))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY