2010 Hyundai I10 1.1L Petrol · PK60 ADZ

The Hyundai i10’s most recent MOT test on 2026-03-13—just four months ago—confirms it passed with no defects, though it failed the prior test on 2026-03-04 at nearly identical mileage (122,453 vs. 122,474). This pattern of consecutive failures and passes at roughly the same mileage suggests a test centre error rather than a genuine mechanical issue, as no recurring faults appear in the record. The vehicle’s roadworthiness status is therefore stable, with no evidence of worsening conditions or unresolved structural concerns. However, the repeated retesting raises questions about whether minor, non-critical issues were overlooked or if the tester’s attention was divided. The recorded mileage of 122,474 miles over 16 years aligns with typical usage for this model, averaging around 7,655 miles annually. There are no significant gaps in service intervals or abrupt spikes in mileage between tests, though the lack of a service history beyond MOTs means critical maintenance—such as timing belt replacement, suspension servicing, or differential fluid changes—cannot be confirmed. The most recent 12,000-mile gap between tests (from 2025-03-05 to 2026-03-13) is acceptable but does not provide assurance that intermediate wear items like brake pads, clutch components, or cooling system integrity have been addressed. Given the absence of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear components that are not routinely checked in MOTs. Focus on the suspension—particularly rear bushes and coil springs—for excessive play or corrosion, as these are common failure points in this model. The brakes, though not flagged, should be examined for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has been driven hard or in wet conditions. Additionally, check for structural rust around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as this model is prone to corrosion in older examples. A thorough brake fluid flush and cooling system pressure test are also advisable, as these are not MOT-checked but critical for longevity. The repeated retesting hints at potential oversight, so verifying recent service records—if available—would further clarify the vehicle’s true condition.