2017 Suzuki Celerio 1.0L Petrol · SV17 AFF

The Suzuki Celerio’s most recent MOT tests, conducted on 2025-11-26 at 89,140 miles , reveal a concerning pattern of two consecutive failures despite no recorded defects. This suggests either a tester error, a systemic issue with the MOT system for this model , or—more critically—that the vehicle was driven to test without addressing underlying problems. The previous clean passes in 2024-12-12 (83,392 miles) and 2024-05-23 (78,142 miles) indicate the vehicle was roadworthy at those points, but the lack of advisories or defects in the failed tests implies either a failure to service critical components or a sudden deterioration between tests. The absence of any advisories in the passed tests is particularly notable, as it suggests either diligent maintenance or a vehicle that has not yet developed the typical wear patterns expected at this mileage. The recorded mileage of 89,140 miles over nine years (as of 2026) equates to roughly 9,900 miles annually , which is within the typical range for a vehicle of this age. There are no extended gaps in mileage accumulation that would indicate prolonged neglect, nor is there evidence of rapid wear from excessive use. However, the lack of MOT tests between 2024-05-23 and 2024-12-12 —a seven-month gap —is unusual, as Suzuki Celérios typically require testing every 12 months . This suggests either the vehicle was not driven frequently enough to trigger a test or, more concerning, that it was not legally required to be tested due to low mileage. The identical mileage (89,140) for both the 2025 tests is also suspicious, as it implies the vehicle was not moved between tests, which would be highly irregular unless it was stored. Given the recurring MOT failures without defects , a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of suspension components , particularly the rear suspension bushes and coil springs , as these are common failure points in this model. The braking system —specifically the rear calipers and discs —should be checked for binding or excessive wear , as the repeated failures may indicate a recurring brake-related issue despite passing tests. Structural integrity is also a concern; corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe should be examined, as this model is prone to hidden rust in high-mileage examples. Finally, the exhaust emissions system warrants scrutiny, as failing twice without defects could point to a failing catalytic converter or oxygen sensor , which often trigger MOT failures without obvious physical signs. The lack of advisories in the passed tests is both a red flag and a relief—it suggests the vehicle was not driven with known mechanical faults , but it also implies no proactive maintenance was recorded. Buyers should demand a full service history beyond MOT records, as the absence of servicing intervals means critical items like timing belt (if applicable), power steering fluid, and differential oil may not have been changed. The tyres should be inspected for uneven wear , which could indicate suspension or alignment issues , while the electrical system —particularly the lights and indicators —should be tested, as these are common MOT failure points. Given the unexplained failures , a pre-purchase inspection by a specialist Suzuki technician is strongly advised.