1999 Honda CBR600F 0.6L Petrol · T52 KRL

The dominant narrative for this 1999 CBR600F is a generally clean MOT record punctuated by a single failure in 2013 and a handful of recurring minor‑wear advisories; the most recent test in June 2026 was a pass with no defects recorded, confirming that the bike has met the statutory safety standards for the latest inspection period. With only 35,339 mi logged over roughly 27 years the average annual mileage sits around 1,300 mi, well below typical usage for a sport‑bike of this age. Such low utilisation often points to extended periods of storage or very light riding, which can be gentle on wear items like brakes, clutch plates and engine bearings but may also allow rubber components, seals and fuel system elements to age in place. The MOT history shows a gap of eight years between the 2008 and 2016 tests, suggesting the bike may have been off the road for a substantial interval, a factor that should be examined during a pre‑purchase inspection. The 2014 advisories about light misting on both front shock absorber stanchions indicate early signs of internal oil leakage, a condition that can progress to reduced damping and a noticeable “soft” feel over bumps. On a test ride, listen for a hollow thump when traversing potholes or uneven pavement and feel for any excessive front‑end dive under braking; any uneven rebound or a squishy sensation may warrant a full shock rebuild or replacement. The tyre‑valve‑stem advisories (recorded in 2013 and 2014) and the 2018 rear‑tyre tread warning mean the current valve caps and tyre condition should be inspected visually for cracks, corrosion or loss of pressure, and the rear tyre tread depth measured to ensure it remains above the legal limit. The 2013 failure for “throttle operating incorrectly” and “locking devices not correctly fitted” suggests a past issue with the throttle linkage or throttle‑by‑wire safety interlocks that was cleared after remedial work. Verify that throttle response is smooth and linear from idle to full twist, with no dead spots or hesitation, and that the throttle housing and any safety lock mechanisms move freely without binding. While no further failures have been recorded, a comprehensive check of the throttle cables, throttle position sensor (if fitted) and any associated safety switches is prudent, as lingering wear could re‑emerge under load. Overall, the bike presents a largely compliant history but the buyer should focus the inspection on front suspension integrity, tyre‑valve condition, rear tyre tread, and throttle operation to confirm that the earlier minor issues have been fully resolved.