Official DVLA Record
Road Tax Paid

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5L Petrol · Y10 FAK

Y10 FAK

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer (1.5L, petrol). First registered 29/07/2009. Recorded mileage 124,324 miles. MOT status: Expired. Taxed until 01/12/2026.

Make & Model
MITSUBISHI LANCER
Year / Origin
2009 · Leeds
Safety Recall
Unknown
MOT Status
Valid until 16/09/2026
Road Tax
Taxed (01/12/2026)
Recorded Mileage
124,324 mi
ULEZ Compliance
ULEZ Compliant (Euro 4+)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 1.5L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Expired
Valid until 16/09/2026
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/12/2026
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2009
Engine
1499cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The most recent MOT test on the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer was conducted on 2025-09-13 and passed, though it carried several persistent advisories that suggest a pattern of wear rather than outright failure. The vehicle’s maintenance history reflects a stable but concerning trend—while the car has passed each MOT since 2023, the recurring advisories on brake discs, pads, suspension arm bushes, and oil leaks indicate ongoing mechanical stress that demands closer attention. The fact that the same issues resurface in multiple tests, particularly the rear suspension arm bush wear and front/rear brake disc conditions, suggests that these components are nearing critical thresholds where further deterioration could compromise roadworthiness or safety. The advisory on underside corrosion is also notable, as it is a common issue in older vehicles left exposed to the elements, potentially compromising structural integrity over time. The recorded mileage of 124,324 miles for a 17-year-old Lancer is typical for its age, averaging around 7,313 miles annually, which aligns with moderate usage patterns. However, the absence of a service history or clear gaps in mileage accumulation could imply either underutilised or poorly maintained periods, where components like seals, fluids, and bearings may have degraded without regular replenishment. The oil leak advisories, in particular, could be exacerbated by prolonged idling or standing, as standing vehicles are more prone to oil seepage from worn seals or gaskets, particularly in the valve cover or oil filter housing. Meanwhile, the consistent wear on brake components—especially the front discs and pads—may be influenced by both usage frequency and the vehicle’s braking habits, such as hard stops or frequent city driving. For the prospective buyer, the most urgent checks should focus on the suspension and braking systems. Inspect the rear trailing arm bushes for excessive play or noise when the vehicle is in motion, particularly on bumps or when cornering sharply. Listen for a metallic clunking or rattling from the rear suspension, which could indicate further bush failure or loose components. The brake discs should be examined for uneven wear, pitting, or scoring, and the pads should be checked for residual thickness—if they are significantly worn down, replacement is advisable before the discs become dangerously thin. The oil leak should be addressed promptly, as it may indicate a failing oil seal or gasket, which could lead to engine damage if left unchecked. A thorough visual inspection of the underside for corrosion, particularly around the wheel arches and exhaust system, is also critical, as this could compromise the vehicle’s structural integrity and lead to costly repairs if ignored. In addition to the above, the buyer should conduct a comprehensive physical inspection of the vehicle’s exterior and interior. Check the tyre tread depth and sidewall condition for signs of perishing or cracking, which can weaken the tyre structure and reduce safety. The 12V battery should be tested for voltage and capacity, as older vehicles are more susceptible to failing batteries, especially if the car has been left unused for extended periods. Inspect the exhaust system for leaks or excessive rust, which could affect emissions performance and structural integrity. Finally, verify that the service book or maintenance records are up to date, particularly for fluid changes—oil, coolant, and brake fluid should be replaced in line with manufacturer recommendations, even if the vehicle has passed an MOT, as fluid degradation can occur over time regardless of mileage. If the vehicle has been driven frequently, a pre-purchase inspection by a qualified mechanic would be prudent to assess the extent of wear on critical components before purchase.

Y10 FAK Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 13/09/2025
  • 124,324 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 1 historical MOT failure
  • 1 defect noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring brakes items (6 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
60
/ 100 · Average
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Average

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for Y10FAK

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

ULEZ Compliant

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

Reliability & Known Issues

Known faults for Mitsubishi Mitsubishi Lancer

Our database tracks 3 specific mechanical faults and recurring failure patterns identified across UK MOT testing stations for this generation.

Y10 FAK Mileage History

  1. 16/09/2022101,321 mi
  2. 16/09/2022101,328 mi+7 mi
  3. 12/09/2023117,037 mi+15,709 mi
  4. 14/09/2024121,276 mi+4,239 mi
  5. 13/09/2025124,324 mi+3,048 mi

Average of roughly 7,687 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

Y10 FAK MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 18 Sept 2026, 02:00
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer (Y10 FAK) between September 2022 and September 2025.

The record contains 4 passes and 1 failure.

The most recent test on 13 September 2025 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Brakes (6 issues), Suspension (4 issues), Lighting (4 issues), Exhaust & Emissions (2 issues), Bodywork (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 16 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Headlamp light source and lamp not compatible (4.1.4 (c))”; “Nearside Headlamp light source and lamp not compatible (4.1.4 (c))”; “Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY