2011 Skoda Yeti 2.0L Diesel · 3 EDH

The vehicle currently holds a valid MOT status following its April 2026 test at 90,417 miles, though it failed the same test just one day earlier under identical mileage conditions — a clear indication of persistent tyre wear and headlamp alignment issues. The maintenance trend is worsening, particularly concerning the nearside front tyre and rear tyres, which have repeatedly failed due to tread depth and perishing, suggesting either neglect or aggressive driving habits. The headlamp aim issue, while not a structural defect, is a recurring compliance failure that points to either misalignment or faulty adjustment mechanisms. These are not minor advisories but fail conditions under current regulations, and their recurrence implies the vehicle has not been properly maintained between tests. The mileage progression shows a steady climb from 75,455 miles in March 2024 to 90,417 miles in April 2026 — roughly 7,500 miles in 23 months, or about 3,260 miles per year. This is below the average for its age, suggesting the car has been driven moderately, but the recent concentration of failures at the same mileage point indicates a sudden deterioration rather than gradual wear. The gap between the 2025 and 2024 tests is 5,786 miles over 11 months, which is reasonable, but the fact that the 2026 test failed the same tyres and headlamp as the prior year’s test — despite no intervening MOT — suggests the previous owner may have deferred repairs or ignored advisories. There are no signs of rapid mileage accumulation, but there is clear evidence of deferred maintenance. Buyers should inspect the front and rear tyres in person, paying close attention to tread depth, sidewall cracking, and any uneven wear patterns that may indicate suspension misalignment or worn bushes. The repeated headlamp aim failure warrants checking the adjustment mechanism and whether the headlamp units themselves are damaged or misaligned due to impact or age. Suspension components, particularly the coil springs and bushes, should be examined for sagging or binding, as these can contribute to uneven tyre wear. Brake calipers and discs should be checked for binding or excessive wear, especially since the rear tyres failed due to perishing — a condition often linked to moisture ingress or poor brake heat dissipation. Structural rust, particularly around wheel arches and sills, should be assessed, as corrosion can compromise integrity and is often overlooked until it becomes severe. The vehicle’s mechanical condition is not catastrophic, but the pattern of failures indicates a lack of consistent upkeep. While it passed in 2025 and 2024, the 2026 results show that the previous owner did not address the tyre and lighting issues, which are both safety-critical. A buyer should treat this as a vehicle requiring immediate attention to tyres, lighting, and suspension alignment, and should not assume that a recent pass means the car is mechanically sound. The mileage is reasonable for age, but the maintenance history reveals a pattern of deferred fixes that may lead to more expensive repairs if left unaddressed.