2010 Ford Fiesta 1.6L Diesel · AO10 EGC

The most recent MOT test on 2025-07-09 confirmed the vehicle passed without recorded defects, though it follows an unusual pattern of two consecutive tests—one pass and one fail—on identical dates in 2025 and 2024. This suggests either administrative duplication or a brief unresolved issue that was not formally logged. The last clean pass in August 2023, combined with the lack of defects in the most recent cycle, indicates no obvious worsening trend in major systems. However, the absence of advisories or defect notes means critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or binding calipers were not explicitly cleared, leaving potential hidden wear unaddressed. The recorded mileage of 152,497 miles over 16 years reflects a steady usage rate of approximately 9,500 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps in the MOT history, and no abrupt spikes in mileage between tests suggest consistent maintenance intervals. While this average wear rate is neither excessive nor unusually light, it does not provide insight into whether the vehicle has undergone regular servicing beyond statutory checks. The lack of pre-MOT servicing records means consumable items like brake pads, timing belt, or fluid levels cannot be verified from this data alone. Given the sparse defect history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of suspension components, particularly rear bushes and coil springs, as these often fail without immediate MOT failure but compromise handling and safety. The brakes, while not flagged in tests, may show uneven wear or binding calipers after prolonged use at this mileage. Structural integrity should also be assessed for corrosion, especially around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as these areas are prone to deterioration in a 16-year-old vehicle. The engine bay should be checked for leaks, belt tension, and fluid condition, as these are not routinely tested in MOTs but can indicate neglect. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are sound—only that they were not severe enough to fail inspection at the time of testing.