2016 Audi A3 2.5L Petrol · AX16 NWH

The most recent MOT test on 8 October 2025 was recorded as a pass, although this followed closely on a fail on 3 October 2025. The earlier test had identified a dangerous failure on the offside front tyre, which exhibited a lump caused by structural separation of the inner wall, alongside a dangerous failure on the nearside front tyre with ply or cords exposed on the inner edge. Both front tyres were also noted as being worn on their edges, suggesting a possible tracking or suspension geometry concern. The test was also failed on a major basis for a missing exhaust catalytic converter and an inability to complete the emissions check, indicating that the vehicle was non-compliant with emissions legislation as presented on that date. Given that the vehicle subsequently passed within five days, it is reasonable to assume remedial work was carried out, but a prospective buyer should verify that the catalytic converter has been replaced with a type-approved unit and that supporting documentation is available. The recorded mileage of 44,785 miles over a ten-year period equates to an average of around 4,478 miles per annum, which is well below the typical usage profile for a 2016 Audi A3. While low annual mileage can be associated with reduced wear on internal combustion components and drivetrain items, it also raises the likelihood of degradation through standing rather than mechanical fatigue. The MOT history shows relatively consistent annual tests with broadly incremental mileage progression, but the very low overall usage means the vehicle has likely spent prolonged periods stationary. This pattern commonly accelerates corrosion on brake discs, particularly where the vehicle is stored outside or used only for short trips, and can lead to binding or seized caliper pistons and sliding mechanisms. Coolant, brake fluid, and automatic transmission fluid (if applicable) degrade on a calendar basis regardless of mileage, and these should be verified as recently renewed. For a prospective buyer, the advisory notes relating to tyre wear and deterioration warrant close attention. The recurring advisory on the offside rear tyre worn on its edges, repeated across both the 2025 fail and pass, suggests an ongoing alignment or suspension issue that has not been resolved, and a four-wheel alignment should be considered. Edge wear can also be symptomatic of worn suspension bushes, sagging coil springs, or weakened anti-roll bar links, all of which are common on higher-mileage or aging vehicles. On a test drive, listen for any clonking or knocking from the front suspension over speed humps or rough surfaces, and pay attention to vague or wandering steering response, as well as any pulling to one side under braking. The earlier advisories from 2019 regarding cracking and perishing on the front tyres indicate a pattern of age-related tyre degradation, and a thorough inspection of all four tyres for sidewall cracking, tread depth, and manufacture date is strongly recommended. Given the low mileage, the buyer should also concentrate on age-related items that do not depend on accumulated miles. The 12-volt battery is likely to be of considerable age and should be load-tested, as prolonged standing and infrequent use rapidly depletes battery capacity. Brake discs and pads should be physically examined for surface corrosion, lipping, and any evidence of caliper seizure, even though the MOT history is clean for braking components. Coolant and brake fluid should be checked for age and condition, with brake fluid ideally renewed every two years regardless of mileage due to its hygroscopic nature. The presence of undertray fitment advisories is routine and not a concern, but a thorough underside inspection on a ramp is advisable to verify the integrity of the exhaust system, suspension arms, anti-roll bar drop links, and rear subframe mounting points, all of which are known areas for corrosion or wear on vehicles of this age. Finally, the timing chain, tensioner, and associated guides on the 1.4 TFSI or 1.0 TFSI engines commonly fitted to this model should be confirmed as having been addressed, as this is a known issue that is not reflected in MOT testing.