2014 Ford Kuga 2.0L Diesel · DA54 ACS

This 2014 Ford Kuga has maintained a clean MOT history with no defects or advisories recorded across the last five annual tests, most recently passing on 16 May 2025 at 69,108 miles. The absence of any repeat failures or advisories suggests the vehicle has been subject to consistent, if not rigorous, maintenance over its lifetime. However, the most recent test occurred just over two years ago, placing it well beyond the current DVSA recommendation for annual checks. While no mechanical issues have been formally documented, the extended period since the last inspection introduces an element of uncertainty regarding wear items like brake pads, suspension bushes, and tyre condition—components that degrade predictably over time and are not always captured in a standard MOT. The recorded mileage of 69,108 miles over approximately 12 years equates to an average of around 5,759 miles annually, which is unusually low for a vehicle of this age. There are no gaps in the MOT record that would indicate prolonged periods of non-use, but the steady accumulation of mileage at this rate implies the Kuga has likely been stored or driven infrequently. This could mean reduced wear on high-mileage components like the engine or transmission, but it also raises questions about the condition of rubber seals, battery health, and potential corrosion from moisture accumulation. The most notable mileage jump occurred between the 2022 and 2023 tests, where the odometer increased by 7,419 miles in just over a year—a relatively modest rise, though still higher than the subsequent annual averages. Given the lack of documented faults, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of wear-and-tear items that are not routinely checked in an MOT. Focus on the suspension, particularly the condition of the coil springs, bushes, and dampers, as these are critical for handling and safety but often fail silently. The brakes should be examined closely for uneven wear, binding calipers, or excessive corrosion on the discs—especially if the vehicle has spent extended periods stationary. Tyre tread depth, while not flagged in past tests, should be verified, as failing twice on this criterion in prior records would have been cause for failure. Finally, inspect the underbody for signs of structural corrosion, particularly around the wheel arches and sills, as this is a common issue for vehicles of this age and mileage. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are pristine, but it does indicate they have not yet reached a critical failure point.