2018 Toyota C-HR 1.2L Petrol · DA68 AZR

The Toyota C-HR presents a clean MOT history with no defects recorded across its five most recent tests, all of which passed without advisories or failures. The latest inspection on 8 August 2025 at 52,657 miles confirms the vehicle remains mechanically sound under current DVSA standards, with no signs of recurring issues or deferred repairs. This consistency suggests the car has been well maintained by its previous owners, at least in terms of compliance with mandatory checks. The absence of advisories—particularly in areas prone to wear such as brakes, suspension, or emissions—indicates no immediate red flags, though this does not preclude minor, non-MOT-critical wear that would only surface through a thorough pre-purchase inspection. The mileage accumulation of approximately 6,582 miles per year aligns closely with the average for an eight-year-old vehicle, reflecting neither excessive nor unusually light usage. The recorded mileages progress logically: 24,345 miles in September 2021, rising steadily to 52,657 miles by August 2025, with no sudden spikes or prolonged gaps that might suggest neglect or infrequent use. This steady pattern reduces concerns about accelerated wear in high-stress components, though it does not eliminate the need for a closer look at consumables like tyres, brake pads, and fluids, which may have been refreshed outside of MOT cycles. Given the lack of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise a hands-on check of components not covered by the MOT, such as the condition of suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake fluid quality, all of which can degrade without triggering a test failure. The rear brakes, often prone to binding or uneven wear, should be tested for responsiveness and drag, while the exhaust system—particularly the mounts and heat shields—might show signs of corrosion or fatigue despite no MOT flags. Structural integrity, including sills, wheel arches, and underbody corrosion, should also be inspected, as surface rust can compromise long-term safety even if it hasn’t yet reached critical levels. Finally, while the MOT history is flawless, the absence of advisories does not guarantee the vehicle has been serviced to Toyota’s recommended intervals. A service history would provide clearer insight into oil changes, filter replacements, and timing belt condition—critical factors for a vehicle of this age. Without one, the buyer should assume the car has relied on basic compliance rather than proactive maintenance, and factor in potential near-term servicing costs.